Skip to main content

Security report for thisisengineering.org.uk

Royal Academy of Engineering · Education · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Thisisengineering.org.uk is an educational website operated under the Royal Academy of Engineering, focused on promoting engineering careers and providing resources for students and educators. The site offers rich multimedia content, career guidance, and profiles of engineers, positioning itself as an authoritative resource in the STEM education sector within the United Kingdom. The domain has been active since 2017, consistent with the maturity of the content and the organization's initiatives. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. It is hosted by Easyspace Ltd, a reputable UK hosting provider. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility standards, with a clean and professional design that enhances user experience. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. While some security headers are not explicitly detected, the overall posture is strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The use of Google reCAPTCHA cookies indicates bot protection measures. Privacy policies and cookie declarations are comprehensive and transparent. Overall, the website presents a low risk profile with strong business credibility and compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing explicit security policies, and maintaining regular audits of third-party scripts to sustain trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thisisengineering.org.uk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention thisisengineering.org.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for thisisengineering.org.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Royal Academy of Engineering leverages this platform to engage young audiences and educators by providing career pathways and real-world engineering insights. The business model is educational and informational, supported by a reputable parent organization. The site’s market position is strong within the UK STEM education ecosystem, benefiting from official backing and consistent branding. Revenue streams are likely indirect, through educational grants and partnerships rather than direct sales. The partnership ecosystem includes major platforms like Google and social media channels for outreach. Growth indicators include active social media presence and multimedia content integration.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent via Cookiebot, and bot detection cookies from Google reCAPTCHA. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. However, some recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly present and should be implemented to harden security. Incident response and security policy pages are not found, indicating an area for improvement in transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is well addressed through privacy and cookie policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to enhance security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Conduct regular third-party script audits to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  4. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and practices.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and perform periodic performance optimizations to sustain excellent user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Royal Academy of Engineering
Description
Find out about how to get a career in engineering and what it is like to be an engineer.
Key services
Career guidance in engineering, Profiles of engineers, Information on engineering projects, Educational multimedia content
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA cookies for bot detection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and maintained by a reputable organization.
  2. Strong focus on engineering education and career guidance.
  3. Compliant with GDPR and cookie consent regulations.
  4. No visible security or privacy red flags.
  5. Use of third-party analytics and marketing tools is transparent and consented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, integrated with Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Cookiebot is used for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. The CMS is likely Umbraco, inferred from HTML class names and URL patterns. Hosting is provided by Easyspace Ltd, a UK-based provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility. The site uses canonical URLs and Open Graph metadata for SEO and social sharing. There is room for improvement in security headers and explicit framework usage disclosure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thisisengineering.org.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thisisengineering.org.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.