Skip to main content

Security report for thisfootdoesnotexist.com

mschf · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

This Foot Does Not Exist is a niche AI-driven website that generates fake images of feet using GAN technology. The site is operated by the entity 'mschf' and offers a unique service where users can text a phone number to receive AI-generated foot images. The business model is novelty and entertainment-focused, targeting a general audience interested in AI-generated content. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks, likely Vue.js, and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS with Google Tag Manager for analytics. The website is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO but lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing key security headers and DNSSEC. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved to enhance trust. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and appropriate for the business age and type, with no suspicious WHOIS patterns detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thisfootdoesnotexist.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche market in AI-generated novelty content, leveraging GAN technology to create unique images. Its competitive advantage lies in the novelty and viral potential of the service. Revenue streams are not explicit but may include brand awareness or indirect monetization through the parent entity 'mschf'. The target customer segment is broad, including AI enthusiasts and novelty seekers. The partnership ecosystem is minimal with no explicit partners or subsidiaries identified. The business operates as a small entity founded in 2019, with consistent domain registration and hosting infrastructure. Growth indicators are limited due to the niche nature of the service.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer is protected, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers are detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, reducing readiness for security incidents. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is poor. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture requires enhancements to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Establish an incident response contact channel and vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. Improve accessibility and SEO optimization to enhance user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
mschf
Description
A website that uses AI to generate fake foot pictures and offers a service to send these images via text message.
Key services
AI-generated fake foot images, SMS-based image delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Vue.js (implied by vue-ssr-id attributes)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche AI novelty project generating fake foot images.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to a phone number mentioned in meta description.
  4. No forms detected in the HTML content.
  5. Uses modern JavaScript framework (Vue.js) and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. No explicit adult or NSFW content detected.
  8. Domain registration is consistent and not privacy protected.
  9. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, likely Vue.js, with server-side rendering indicated by SSR attributes. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and is hosted with Cloudflare DNS services. The site loads multiple JavaScript bundles and uses Bulma CSS framework for styling. Performance is moderate with preloading of scripts but no explicit performance optimization details. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive meta tags and viewport settings. Accessibility is basic, with standard HTML semantics but no advanced ARIA roles or accessibility features detected. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured JSON-LD data found. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thisfootdoesnotexist.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thisfootdoesnotexist.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.