Skip to main content

Security report for thefacereport.online

The Face Report · Technology

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Email security.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Face Report is a niche online service offering free facial analysis tools including face shape, symmetry, and attractiveness tests. The service is privacy-centric, performing all analysis client-side without photo uploads or account requirements, appealing to privacy-conscious users seeking style guidance. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, ensuring a fast and accessible user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and appropriate security headers, though no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure suitable for its small-scale, specialized service model.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      thefacereport.online publishes no SPF record, so receiving servers cannot tell which servers may send mail as this domain.

      What to do: Publish one TXT record listing your mail providers, for example "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourprovider.com -all". A domain that sends no mail should publish "v=spf1 -all".

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      There is no DMARC record at _dmarc.thefacereport.online, so receivers have no instruction for mail that fails SPF and DKIM.

      What to do: Publish a TXT record at _dmarc.thefacereport.online, starting with "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@thefacereport.online" and moving to p=quarantine or p=reject once reports look clean.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thefacereport.online

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
89
Security headers
70
Email security
65
DNS health
95
Network security
100
Website hygiene
95
GDPR outside view
100
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention thefacereport.online, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for thefacereport.online right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Face Report operates on a freemium business model, providing free facial analysis with an optional paid upgrade for report storage. Its market position is that of a specialized tool in the beauty and style technology niche, targeting individuals interested in understanding their facial features for personal styling. The company emphasizes privacy and transparency, with comprehensive FAQs and methodology explanations. No direct contact information or extensive business details are provided, indicating a lean operation focused on digital service delivery. The lack of advertising and tracking suggests a user-friendly, privacy-first approach, potentially appealing to a discerning audience.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. The client-side processing of photos eliminates risks associated with data transmission and storage. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security score is high, reflecting good practices but with potential to enhance trust through formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner if cookies or tracking technologies are used to comply with privacy regulations.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear contact information for support or security inquiries to enhance credibility.
  5. Maintain and regularly update security headers and SSL configurations to uphold strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Face Report
Description
Free face analysis with face shape, symmetry, proportions and a downloadable face report. Provides clear explanations and simple style tips based on a single photo analyzed in-browser without upload or sign-up.
Key services
Face shape test, Attractiveness test, Face symmetry test, Canthal tilt test, Downloadable face reports
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, JavaScript, WebAssembly (likely for face detection model), SVG for facial landmark visualization
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web browser
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No photo uploads, analysis done client-side
  • No sensitive data exposed in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a free, client-side face analysis tool with no photo uploads.
  2. Strong emphasis on privacy and no account requirement.
  3. Clear and comprehensive FAQ and methodology sections.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite privacy policy presence.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Modern web technologies used with good performance and mobile optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks Next.js and React, leveraging client-side processing for facial analysis which enhances privacy and performance. SVG graphics are used extensively for facial landmark visualization, indicating a sophisticated UI design. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured data. No CMS or third-party hosting provider was explicitly identified. Performance is fast with asynchronous script loading and minimal external dependencies. The technical implementation supports a smooth user experience with low technical debt and good maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thefacereport.online. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thefacereport.online.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.