Skip to main content

Security report for textmagic.com

Textmagic · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Textmagic is a technology company providing a comprehensive SaaS platform for business text messaging and email campaigns. Established since 2001, it serves over 100,000 users with services including mass texting, SMS marketing, two-way chat, email-to-SMS integration, voice calls, and helpdesk ticketing. The platform supports omnichannel communication and offers mobile apps for iOS and Android, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The website is built on WordPress with advanced SEO and analytics integrations, demonstrating strong digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, bot management, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. The absence of WHOIS domain registration data introduces some legitimacy concerns, but the professional web presence and consistent branding mitigate these. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, and security, with room for improvement in business credibility transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching textmagic.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
60
Email security
82
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention textmagic.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10,913
Employees
12
Customers
10,844
Third parties
57
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-05-13 · 10 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for textmagic.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –my.textmagic.com2026-05-13
  • –my.textmagic.com2026-05-12
  • –my.textmagic.com2026-04-30
  • –my.textmagic.com2026-01-10
  • –my.textmagic.com2025-11-13

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Textmagic occupies a strong position in the business communication technology sector, targeting businesses of all sizes seeking efficient SMS and email marketing solutions. Its competitive advantages include a unified omnichannel platform, ease of use with no-code integrations, and comprehensive messaging features. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees and pay-per-message charges. The company leverages partnerships with major ad networks and analytics providers to optimize marketing efforts. Growth indicators include recent product launches such as email campaigns and AI-assisted communication features. The ecosystem includes integrations with helpdesk software and popular marketing tools, enhancing its market reach and customer retention.

Security posture

The security maturity of Textmagic's website is good, with enforced HTTPS, bot management via Cloudflare, and a robust cookie consent framework supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of a publicly available security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and may impact trust for security-conscious customers. The site uses multiple third-party scripts for analytics and advertising, which require ongoing security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture supports business operations well but would benefit from enhanced documentation and communication of security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance transparency by providing contact details for a Data Protection Officer or privacy representative.
  4. Ensure all security headers (e.g., X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) are explicitly set and documented.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize supply chain security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
VAT number
GB851556810
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Textmagic
Description
The all-in-one solution for all your business texting needs - marketing campaigns, two-way SMS chats, notifications, and staff communication.
Key services
Mass texting, SMS marketing campaigns, Two-way SMS chat, Email to SMS, Omnichannel messaging, Voice calls, Helpdesk ticketing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Segment Analytics, Google Tag Manager, PostHog, Cloudflare Bot Management, CookieYes Consent Management, OptiMonk, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Ads, Quora Conversion Pixel, Google Ads Conversion Tracking, Bing Ads UET
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Bot management via Cloudflare
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of security cookies (e.g., __cf_bm)
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Segment, Google Analytics, Hotjar, PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads, Quora Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Ads Pixel, Quora Conversion Pixel, Google Ads Conversion Tracking, Bing UET
Marketing tools
Segment Analytics, Hotjar, OptiMonk
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  3. Extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics tools
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, raising some legitimacy questions
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  7. No terms of service page clearly identified
  8. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern SEO and analytics integrations
  9. Mobile and accessibility optimizations are well implemented
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO for optimization, leveraging a modern tech stack including Segment Analytics, PostHog, Hotjar, and multiple ad network pixels. Hosting appears to be behind Cloudflare, providing bot management and DDoS protection. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and deferred JavaScript improving load times. The use of structured data (JSON-LD) enhances SEO and content discoverability. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require vigilant security management. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and supports scalable business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with textmagic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review textmagic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.