Skip to main content

Security report for tetelespamatskola.lv

Teteles pamatskola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Teteles pamatskola is a local primary educational institution in Latvia, providing essential schooling services to the community of Tetele and surrounding areas. The website serves as an information portal for parents and students, offering details on admissions, extracurricular activities, school environment, news, and events. The site is built on WordPress and uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Photoswipe, and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Plausible Analytics. The content is well organized and professionally presented, targeting local families and stakeholders. From a technical perspective, the website demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity with good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. The use of HTTPS and IP anonymization in analytics reflects a basic commitment to security and privacy. However, the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates room for improvement in compliance and security posture. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification, but the website content aligns with a legitimate educational entity. Security-wise, the site shows no immediate vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The privacy policy is present and likely GDPR compliant, but no explicit cookie consent or incident response information is available. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced headers, transparency, and formal vulnerability disclosure channels. The risk level is moderate with no critical issues detected. Strategically, the school should focus on improving privacy compliance by implementing cookie consent banners, publishing security policies, and enhancing security headers. These steps will strengthen trust and regulatory adherence. Additionally, obtaining and verifying WHOIS data would improve domain legitimacy confidence. The website effectively supports the school's mission but can enhance its digital security and compliance to better protect its community and reputation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tetelespamatskola.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tetelespamatskola.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for tetelespamatskola.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Teteles pamatskola operates as a small, local educational institution primarily serving the Tetele community in Latvia. Its market position is that of a community-focused primary school with a stable presence, evidenced by regular news and event updates. The business model is typical for public or government-funded schools, focusing on education and community engagement rather than commercial revenue. The website supports this by providing detailed admission procedures, extracurricular activities, and facility rental information. Competitive advantages include a clear digital presence with up-to-date content and a user-friendly website that meets the needs of parents and students. The use of modern web technologies and analytics tools indicates an awareness of digital trends, although the absence of advanced marketing or affiliate programs suggests a non-commercial focus. Growth indicators are limited but the site’s maintenance and content freshness imply ongoing operational stability. Partnerships appear limited to the platform provider (SchoolioWP), which is highlighted in the footer. There is no evidence of broader commercial partnerships or subsidiaries. Overall, the school's operations and market presence are consistent with a small educational entity focused on local service delivery.

Security posture

The website’s security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization, reflecting privacy-conscious data collection. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No forms or input fields were detected in the analyzed content, minimizing attack surface from injection vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file further reduces the ability for external parties to report issues responsibly. Cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which may impact GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small educational website but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, cookie consent, and public security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with EU cookie laws and improve privacy compliance.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and contact information to increase transparency and preparedness for security events.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Verify and monitor WHOIS data to ensure domain registration legitimacy and improve trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Teteles pamatskola
Description
Teteles pamatskola is an educational institution located in Latvia, providing primary education services. The school offers information about admission, extracurricular activities, school environment, and contact details. It also provides news updates and event information relevant to students and parents.
Key services
Primary education, Extracurricular activities, Facility rental for events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Photoswipe, Slick Carousel, Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based primary school site in Latvia.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and relevant information for parents and students.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. Privacy policy is present but no cookie consent banner detected.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Uses Google Analytics with IP anonymization and Plausible Analytics for privacy-friendly tracking.
  9. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  10. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2, leveraging common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 3.7.1 and plugins like Photoswipe and Slick Carousel for UI enhancements. It uses Google Analytics with IP anonymization and Plausible Analytics for privacy-friendly tracking. The site includes proper meta tags for SEO and Open Graph tags for social media sharing. The HTML is valid and well-structured, with inline CSS for emoji styling and global styles defined. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading implemented for images and deferred loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, with ARIA roles and labels used appropriately. However, no advanced frameworks or hosting provider information was detected. The site does not include forms or interactive input elements in the analyzed content, reducing complexity. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small educational website but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tetelespamatskola.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tetelespamatskola.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.