Skip to main content

Security report for testiniaimokymai.lt

Tęstinių Mokymų Centras · Education · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tęstinių Mokymų Centras is a Lithuanian-based education company specializing in continuous training and professional consulting services for businesses and individuals. Established in 2008, it positions itself as the first continuous training company in Lithuania, offering tailored solutions based on detailed needs analysis. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting Lithuanian enterprises and individuals seeking training services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Visual Composer, leveraging common marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and Google reCAPTCHA on forms, alongside a cookie consent banner indicating GDPR compliance awareness. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available, and WHOIS data is inaccessible due to query limits, limiting domain transparency. Overall, the website demonstrates moderate technical maturity and business credibility with room for improvement in security transparency and WHOIS data availability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching testiniaimokymai.lt

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the education sector, focusing on professional training and consulting services. Its market position as a pioneer in continuous training in Lithuania since 2008 suggests a niche leadership. The business model revolves around customized training programs for corporate clients and individuals, supported by partnerships such as with davinci365.lt. Revenue streams likely include training fees and consulting contracts. The target audience is primarily Lithuanian businesses and professionals. The website's content and social media presence support brand visibility and customer engagement. Growth indicators include diversified training offerings and active marketing automation. Strategic observations highlight the importance of enhancing transparency through WHOIS data and publishing security policies to strengthen trust.

Security posture

The website maintains a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and spam protection via Google reCAPTCHA. Cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, reflecting privacy awareness. However, the absence of explicit security headers and public security policies indicates potential gaps in defense-in-depth strategies. The lack of incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms reduces preparedness and transparency. WHOIS data unavailability further limits trust verification. No immediate vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were detected in the content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, publish policies, and improve WHOIS transparency to enhance overall security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish explicit security policies and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Address WHOIS data availability issues by ensuring domain registration details are accessible and up to date to enhance trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tęstinių Mokymų Centras
Description
Pirmoji tęstinių mokymų kompanija Lietuvoje, veikianti nuo 2008 metų. Teikiame profesionalias konsultavimo ir mokymų paslaugas įmonėms ir fiziniams asmenims, pritaikydami individualius sprendimus, kuriuos sudarome nuoseklios poreikių analizės dėka.
Key services
Konsultavimo paslaugos, Mokymai įmonėms, Mokymai fiziniams asmenims, Individualūs sprendimai
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Google reCAPTCHA, Select2, WebFontLoader, Hotjar
Frameworks
WordPress, Visual Composer
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA used on forms
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and includes cookie consent banner indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. Contact information including phone and email is clearly presented in header.
  5. Social media presence is established on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube.
  6. Website is built on WordPress with Visual Composer and uses common marketing and analytics tools.
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response information publicly available.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. Forms use Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection.
  10. External links include marketing automation and analytics services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Visual Composer for page building, supported by jQuery 1.12.4 and modern web fonts loaded via Google Fonts. It integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and a marketing automation service. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive design for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. Technical risks include outdated jQuery version and lack of explicit security headers. Modernization opportunities include upgrading libraries, enhancing accessibility, and improving security configurations to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with testiniaimokymai.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review testiniaimokymai.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.