Skip to main content

Security report for terrait.net

Terra IT · Technology · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Terra IT is a Lithuanian IT company specializing in business management software solutions tailored for various industries such as transport, logistics, manufacturing, and services. Their product portfolio includes ERP systems, project management, transport management, equipment maintenance, and personnel task management systems. The company targets businesses of all sizes within Lithuania, offering both onsite and remote services. The website is professionally designed, mobile responsive, and provides comprehensive information about their services and products. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with Bootstrap 4 framework, integrating modern tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Tawk.to live chat, and Hotjar for analytics and user interaction. The site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and employs security best practices like CSRF tokens and CAPTCHA on forms. However, some security headers are missing, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a solid baseline with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent banner and a privacy policy page in Lithuanian, indicating GDPR awareness. Contact information is clear and consistent with business operations, enhancing trustworthiness. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the domain appears legitimate with privacy protection likely justified for this business type. Overall, Terra IT's website reflects a credible, professional IT service provider with a good security posture and compliance awareness. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and vulnerability disclosure could further enhance trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching terrait.net

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention terrait.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10
Employees
0
Customers
10
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
20%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for terrait.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Terra IT holds a strong position in the Lithuanian IT market as a provider of specialized business management software solutions. Their modular approach allows serving diverse sectors including transportation, manufacturing, and services. The company leverages digital transformation trends such as AI applications and route optimization to maintain competitive advantage. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, customization, implementation services, and ongoing support. The target customer base spans SMEs to larger enterprises requiring integrated IT solutions. The company’s partnership ecosystem includes integration with common platforms and use of third-party analytics and communication tools. Growth indicators include a comprehensive product portfolio and active digital presence. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding incident response capabilities and formalizing security policies to meet evolving compliance requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and forms are protected with Google reCAPTCHA and CSRF tokens, reducing risk of automated abuse and cross-site request forgery. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML source. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a gap that could be exploited in clickjacking or content injection attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. GDPR compliance is addressed through privacy and cookie policies. No vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is present, which could hinder responsible vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small IT service provider but could be improved with enhanced headers, documented policies, and formal vulnerability management.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and customer trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly update Joomla CMS and all third-party plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
VAT number
LT100001154519
Registration number
300043862
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Terra IT
Description
Terra IT provides advanced business management systems and IT solutions tailored for various industries including transport, logistics, manufacturing, and services. Their software products include ERP, project management, transport management, equipment maintenance, and personnel task management systems. They offer services across Lithuania with both onsite and remote support.
Key services
Terra ERP – manufacturing management system, Terra Project – project management system, Terra Logistics – transport management system, Terra CMMS – equipment maintenance management system, Terra Service – personnel task management system, Business digitization, Route optimization, AI applications, System integration, Document digitization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Tawk.to live chat, Hotjar
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4
Platforms
Web, Mobile responsive
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security tokens (CSRF token present in JSON script)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Tawk.to live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded; no suspicious WHOIS patterns detected.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and standard security practices.
  4. Contact information is complete and consistent with business operations.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found on the site.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  9. Use of multiple analytics and tracking tools with consent mechanisms.
  10. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with Bootstrap 4 framework, leveraging jQuery and various third-party services such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Tawk.to live chat. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern web standards with UTF-8 encoding and viewport meta tags. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. The presence of CSRF tokens and reCAPTCHA on forms indicates attention to security in user input handling. However, the lack of some security headers and limited accessibility features suggest areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional business website with room for modernization and enhanced security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with terrait.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review terrait.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.