Skip to main content

Security report for terra.money

Terraform Labs · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Terraform Labs is a blockchain technology company known for its cryptocurrency platform. The website currently serves as a shutdown notice informing visitors about the company's liquidation process effective 30 September 2024. It provides links to social media and official claim portals but lacks detailed business or contact information. The company appears to be in a winding-down phase, limiting active business operations. Technically, the website is minimalistic, hosted on Cloudflare Pages, and uses basic HTML and CSS with Cloudflare analytics. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenges but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective. Security posture is basic with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the lack of privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers are notable gaps. Overall, the site is functional for its purpose as an informational shutdown page but does not meet higher standards for security or privacy compliance. The risk assessment indicates moderate risk primarily due to lack of transparency and compliance features. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, improving security headers, publishing contact and incident response information, and enhancing domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching terra.money

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Terraform Labs operated in the blockchain and cryptocurrency sector, targeting crypto investors and the blockchain community. The business model centered on blockchain platform development and decentralized finance services. Currently, the company is undergoing liquidation, which significantly impacts its market position and operational status. The website reflects this transition with limited content focused on claims processing and winding down. The company’s ecosystem includes social media presence on Twitter and official restructuring portals. There is no evidence of active partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. Revenue streams and growth indicators are not discernible due to the shutdown status. The company’s strategic focus is on managing claims and liquidation processes rather than growth or expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is presumably enabled (not explicitly stated but inferred from Cloudflare hosting). However, no security headers were detected in the provided data, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement and transparency. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information reduces trust and complicates verification. Overall, the security posture is minimal and adequate only for a static informational site but insufficient for active business operations.

Recommendations

  1. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security and incident response contacts.
  4. Improve domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is available or justified if privacy protected.
  5. Regularly audit and update website security posture and compliance documentation.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Terraform Labs
Description
Terraform Labs is a blockchain technology company involved in cryptocurrency and decentralized finance. The company is currently in the process of winding down operations as of 30 September 2024, pursuant to a Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation. The website provides information about the liquidation process and crypto loss claims.
Key services
Blockchain platform development, Crypto loss claims processing
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Cloudflare Pages Analytics
Platforms
Cloudflare Pages
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Pages Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Pages Analytics
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple informational page about Terraform Labs winding down operations.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  5. Minimal external links, mostly to social media and official claim portals.
  6. No security headers or advanced security features detected in provided data.
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  8. Site uses Cloudflare Pages for hosting and analytics.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. Website appears to be a placeholder or shutdown notice rather than a full business site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS, hosted on Cloudflare Pages, and uses Cloudflare analytics for tracking. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. The site loads quickly and is mobile optimized with basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal with no meta tags beyond title and viewport. The technical infrastructure is simple and suitable for a static informational page but lacks modernization features such as structured data, advanced SEO, or interactive elements. There is no evidence of technical debt but also no advanced technical capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with terra.money. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review terra.money.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.