Skip to main content

Security report for ternoa.network

Ternoa · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ternoa is a blockchain platform focused on delivering a fast, secure, and cost-efficient PayFi network designed to onboard billions of retail crypto users. The platform leverages advanced technologies such as TEE-enhanced zkEVM validium and cross-chain interoperability via the Rainbow Bridge. It offers native yield generation and innovative protocols like LEAF for optimized returns, positioning itself as a competitive player in the blockchain and DeFi space. The website reflects a mature digital presence with rich multimedia content, clear branding, and strong social media integration. Technically, the site uses modern web standards and demonstrates good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied and certifications displayed, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response contacts. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but is common in privacy-conscious blockchain projects. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ternoa.network

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ternoa.network, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ternoa.network right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ternoa operates in the blockchain technology and finance sectors, targeting retail crypto users and DeFi participants. Its business model centers on providing a native blockchain network with integrated yield generation and cross-chain bridging capabilities. The company benefits from partnerships with notable backers and blockchain projects, enhancing its ecosystem credibility. Revenue streams likely include token utility (CAPS), transaction fees, and yield optimization services. The platform's innovative use of TEE and zkEVM technologies offers competitive advantages in security and transaction speed. Growth indicators include active community channels and listings on multiple exchanges. Strategic observations highlight the importance of expanding privacy and security disclosures to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage and visible certifications from ITL, Hacken, and CertiK. However, it lacks explicit security headers and publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. No contact channels for security incidents are provided, which may hinder timely reporting and resolution of issues. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS registrant data reduces transparency but is not uncommon for blockchain projects. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices in security headers, incident response, and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies, including dedicated contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations, improving user trust and legal compliance.
  4. Enhance WHOIS transparency if possible or provide clear justification for privacy protection to improve domain trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party dependencies and monitor for vulnerabilities to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ternoa
Description
Ternoa is a blockchain network designed to onboard billions of retail customers into crypto, offering a natively cross-chain TEE-enhanced zkEVM validium. It provides fast, secure, and cost-efficient payment and DeFi-ready solutions with native yield generation.
Key services
zkEVM fast network finality, TEE-enhanced security, Cross-chain Rainbow Bridge, Yield generation on assets, LEAF Protocol for yield optimization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, CSS3, Google Fonts (Inter), Video backgrounds (webm, mp4), SVG icons
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content and interactive elements.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on main pages.
  3. Social media presence is strong with multiple official channels linked.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance.
  5. No explicit security or incident response contact information found.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy or query failure.
  7. Certifications from recognized security firms are displayed.
  8. Website uses modern web technologies and good SEO practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern technology stack including ES modules for JavaScript, CSS3, and Google Fonts, ensuring good performance and mobile responsiveness. Multimedia elements like video backgrounds and SVG icons enhance user experience without significant performance penalties. The site structure is clear with semantic HTML and accessible navigation. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and descriptive content. Technical risks are minimal but include the absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data, which could impact trust and security perception. Opportunities exist to improve privacy compliance and incident response readiness to align with industry best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ternoa.network. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ternoa.network.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.