Skip to main content

Security report for termsfeed.com

TermsFeed · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TermsFeed is a well-established technology company specializing in providing automated legal compliance solutions for businesses, including privacy policies, terms and conditions, cookie consent management, and other essential legal documents. The company has a strong market presence with tens of thousands of users since its founding in 2012, positioning itself as a trusted provider in the compliance software space. Their platform is designed to help businesses stay compliant with global privacy regulations such as GDPR, CCPA, and others, offering a comprehensive suite of tools and resources. Technically, the website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with modern web technologies, including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and privacy-focused analytics like Plausible. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, providing an excellent user experience. The use of JSON-LD structured data enhances SEO and trustworthiness. However, some security best practices such as explicit security headers and incident response disclosures are not evident. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, reflecting a good security posture. There are no visible vulnerabilities or critical issues detected. The absence of a public security policy or vulnerability disclosure program suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but is mitigated by the professional presentation and active business operations. Overall, TermsFeed presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency, publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, and implementing additional security headers to further strengthen the security posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of termsfeed.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching termsfeed.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TermsFeed operates in the legal technology sector, targeting businesses and website/app owners who require automated compliance solutions. Their SaaS business model focuses on subscription and usage-based revenue streams from legal document generation and consent management tools. The company leverages partnerships and positive customer reviews to build market trust and expand its user base. The platform's comprehensive coverage of multiple privacy laws and regulations positions it competitively in a growing market driven by increasing regulatory demands. The absence of phone contact suggests a primarily digital customer support approach. The company maintains a consistent brand image and offers a wide range of compliance products, indicating a diversified service portfolio and a strategic focus on compliance automation.

Security posture

TermsFeed demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and no exposed sensitive information in the HTML content. The use of secure forms and privacy-conscious analytics indicates attention to data protection. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security is a gap that could be addressed to enhance protection against common web attacks. The absence of a public security policy or incident response contact information limits transparency and may affect user trust in security incident handling. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from improved security communication and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file, to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Consider adding verified company phone contact information to improve customer support accessibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and advertising networks to ensure compliance with privacy standards and minimize tracking risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TermsFeed
Description
TermsFeed provides an all-in-one compliance software platform offering tools and resources to generate Privacy Policies, Terms & Conditions, Cookie Consent banners, EULAs, Disclaimers, and more to help businesses achieve and maintain legal compliance effortlessly.
Key services
Privacy Policy Generator, Terms and Conditions Generator, Cookie Consent Management, EULA Generator, Disclaimer Generator, Return and Refund Policy Generator
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Plausible Analytics, Lazy loading, JSON-LD structured data
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
dwin1.com
Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides comprehensive legal compliance tools and resources
  2. Strong focus on privacy and cookie compliance with GDPR, CCPA, and other regulations
  3. Multiple customer reviews and third-party endorsements increase trust
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information publicly available
  5. No phone contact numbers found, only email and contact forms
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics with privacy focus
  7. No WAF or blocking detected, full content accessible
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection or query limitations
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web standards with clean HTML5 and CSS3, supported by JavaScript for interactivity and analytics integration. It uses Plausible Analytics, a privacy-focused analytics tool, and lazy loading techniques to optimize performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected from the HTML content. The site loads quickly and is well-structured for SEO with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical implementation reflects a mature and well-maintained platform suitable for a SaaS compliance service.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100 −10Medium21 findingsView report
  2. 78/100 +6Low25 findingsView report
  3. 72/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with termsfeed.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review termsfeed.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.