Skip to main content

Security report for termsfeed.com

TermsFeed · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TermsFeed operates as a specialized SaaS platform providing automated legal compliance document generation and consent management tools primarily for businesses and website/app owners. Established since 2012, it holds a strong market position with tens of thousands of users relying on its services. The platform offers a comprehensive suite of products including Privacy Policy Generators, Terms & Conditions, Cookie Consent management, EULAs, and Disclaimers, supporting compliance with major privacy laws such as GDPR and CCPA. Technically, the website demonstrates a modern, fast, and mobile-optimized infrastructure using JavaScript and privacy-focused analytics (Plausible). The site is well-structured with clear navigation and professional design, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though it lacks explicit security headers and published incident response policies. No blocking or WAF mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly; however, the website's professional appearance and extensive content mitigate concerns about legitimacy. Privacy compliance is well addressed with visible privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, TermsFeed presents a trustworthy and professional service with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving transparency around incident response to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching termsfeed.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TermsFeed targets businesses needing legal compliance documents, leveraging a SaaS model with automated document generation and consent management tools. Its competitive advantage lies in ease of use, comprehensive coverage of privacy laws, and a broad product suite. Revenue likely derives from subscriptions or pay-per-document services. The company maintains a robust partnership ecosystem evidenced by multiple third-party reviews and social media presence. Growth indicators include continuous content updates and multi-language support. The absence of phone contact suggests a primarily digital customer support model. Strategic observations highlight the importance of expanding security transparency and possibly enhancing direct customer contact channels.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure form submissions. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a public security policy or incident response page limits transparency and readiness perception. Compliance with GDPR and cookie consent regulations is evident, but incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are missing. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved by adopting additional headers and publishing security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Consider adding verified company phone contact information to improve customer support accessibility.
  5. Regularly audit and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TermsFeed
Description
TermsFeed provides an all-in-one compliance software platform offering tools and resources to generate Privacy Policies, Terms & Conditions, Cookie Consent banners, EULAs, Disclaimers, and more to help businesses achieve and maintain legal compliance effortlessly.
Key services
Privacy Policy Generator, Terms and Conditions Generator, Cookie Consent Management, EULA Generator, Disclaimer Generator, Return and Refund Policy Generator
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Plausible Analytics, Lazy loading, Responsive design
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
dwin1.com
Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Strong focus on legal compliance document generation and privacy tools
  3. Multiple language support indicated by hreflang tags
  4. Extensive customer reviews and partner endorsements present
  5. No direct contact phone numbers found, only email and contact form
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available
  7. Use of modern analytics and minimal tracking observed
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend with deferred and asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. It employs Plausible Analytics, a privacy-focused analytics tool, indicating a commitment to user privacy. The site is responsive and mobile-optimized with good SEO practices including canonical links and hreflang tags for multi-language support. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance appears fast with minimal blocking scripts. Technical debt is low, but the absence of certain security headers suggests room for modernization in security practices. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low25 findingsView report
  2. 78/100 +6Low26 findingsView report
  3. 72/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with termsfeed.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review termsfeed.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.