Skip to main content

Security report for teradata.com

Teradata · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Teradata is a leading enterprise technology company specializing in AI-driven autonomous knowledge platforms that enable large organizations to connect, analyze, and operationalize data at scale. Their platform supports multi-modal data integration, AI operationalization, and autonomous decision-making, positioning them as a key player in the AI and data analytics market. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, multi-language support, and strong branding consistent with an enterprise-grade technology provider. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Vue.js, Kentico CMS, and cloud-based monitoring tools like Azure Application Insights, indicating a robust and scalable infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and consent management, though some advanced security headers and public vulnerability disclosures are absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for performance and accessibility, though the lack of WHOIS data transparency is a minor concern. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing vulnerability disclosure policies, and providing clearer incident response contacts to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teradata.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
59
Security headers
80
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Teradata operates in the technology sector, targeting enterprise customers requiring advanced AI and data analytics solutions. Their business model focuses on providing a unified autonomous knowledge platform that integrates data, AI, and workflow automation. The company demonstrates strong market positioning through customer logos, awards, analyst reports, and a global presence with localized sites. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, cloud services, and professional services. The partnership ecosystem includes developer portals, support sites, and investor relations, indicating a mature corporate structure. Growth indicators include continuous platform innovation and multi-cloud deployment options. The company emphasizes trust and security, catering to regulated industries and large enterprises.

Security posture

Teradata's website shows a mature security posture with HTTPS, consent management via TrustArc, and monitoring through Azure Application Insights. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information was found, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. The site complies with GDPR and provides privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from additional best practices and public security communications.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information on the website to facilitate timely communication in case of security events.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced via dependencies.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures with detailed data retention policies and user rights information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Teradata
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Teradata
Description
Teradata is the AI platform for the autonomous era, connecting and scaling across any environment.
Key services
Autonomous Knowledge Platform, Data connectivity and activation, AI operationalization, Agent automation, Cloud and on-premises data management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Azure Application Insights, Lottie Web animations, Intellimize personalization, Celebrus behavioral analytics, Atomic Search Interface
Frameworks
Vue.js (implied by data-v-* attributes)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management via TrustArc
  • Use of Application Insights for monitoring
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Azure Application Insights, Celebrus behavioral analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Application Insights, TrustArc Consent
Marketing tools
Intellimize personalization
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features
  2. Strong branding and consistent corporate identity
  3. Comprehensive navigation with multi-language support
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics
  5. No signs of phishing or malware
  6. No public vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts found
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is uncommon for a major company domain
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Vue.js for frontend interactivity, Kentico CMS for content management, and Microsoft Azure for hosting and telemetry. It uses Google Tag Manager and TrustArc for marketing and consent management, respectively. The site is optimized for performance with preconnect and dns-prefetch hints, lazy loading of images, and asynchronous script loading. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles are present, and the site is mobile responsive. The use of Lottie animations adds visual appeal without significant performance cost. Overall, the technical implementation is robust, scalable, and aligned with enterprise standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teradata.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teradata.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.