Skip to main content

Security report for tengai.io

Tengai AB · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tengai AB operates a specialized AI-driven recruitment platform focused on automating candidate screening through structured interviews with an engaging AI avatar. The company targets recruiters and HR professionals across various sectors including government, retail, and logistics, positioning itself as an innovative solution provider for unbiased and efficient hiring. The website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Intercom, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, GDPR compliance, and adherence to ethical AI principles, although explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly available. Overall, the website demonstrates a professional, trustworthy presence with good content quality and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tengai.io

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
44
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tengai.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tengai.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tengai AB's market positioning as a provider of automated, psychometrically validated recruitment solutions gives it a competitive advantage in the HR technology space. Its SaaS business model focuses on delivering efficiency and quality improvements in hiring processes, supported by compliance with GDPR and the EU AI Act. The company maintains a clear partnership and customer ecosystem, evidenced by client logos and testimonials. Revenue streams likely derive from subscription-based access to the recruiting platform. The company’s target customers include recruitment agencies, public sector entities, and volume hiring organizations, indicating a broad market reach. Strategic observations suggest a focus on innovation, compliance, and candidate experience as key differentiators.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers in place. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy aligned with GDPR indicates good privacy practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represents a compliance gap. The use of third-party scripts such as HubSpot and Intercom introduces typical risks but these are industry-standard tools with established security practices. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security policies and improving accessibility compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear Terms of Service page to improve legal transparency.
  2. Implement and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy, including a security.txt file.
  3. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and security documentation to reflect evolving compliance requirements.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tengai AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tengai AB
Description
Tengai provides an automated screening and recruitment solution where candidates interact with an AI avatar in structured interviews, generating validated competency data compiled into scientific shortlists for faster, smarter hiring decisions.
Key services
Automated structured interviews, AI avatar for candidate interaction, Validated competency data collection, Scientific candidate shortlists, Integration with recruitment platforms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, jQuery 3.6.0, Slick Carousel, Glide.js, Google Tag Manager, Intercom, HubSpot Video Embed
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS framework
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • GDPR compliance
  • Validated psychometric and ethical AI compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, HubSpot Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing Tools, Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HubSpot CMS and marketing platform.
  2. Strong focus on AI-driven recruitment automation and compliance.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present.
  4. No visible security or content blocking issues.
  5. Good use of customer testimonials and trust signals.
  6. No explicit Terms of Service or vulnerability disclosure found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on HubSpot’s platform, utilizing HubSpot CMS and marketing automation tools. It employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 3.6.0, Slick Carousel, and Glide.js for UI components and interactivity. Google Tag Manager and HubSpot Analytics are used for tracking and marketing insights. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some heavy media content such as videos and image carousels. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to optimize loading times and enhance accessibility compliance. The infrastructure is stable and well-integrated with marketing and customer engagement platforms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tengai.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tengai.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.