Skip to main content

Security report for telular.com

Telular Corporation · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Telular Corporation is a technology leader specializing in IoT solutions for commercial telematics, security, and home automation markets. As a business unit of AMETEK, Inc., Telular offers a broad range of turnkey industrial IoT and commercial telematics solutions, leveraging a culture of innovation and a loyal customer base. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear business focus and target audience in industrial and commercial sectors. The technical infrastructure of the website is built on modern web technologies including Sitecore CMS, Bootstrap 4, and various JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Backbone.js. The site employs Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating a mature digital presence with privacy compliance considerations. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are good, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented; however, explicit security headers are not clearly present, and no public security policy or incident response information is available. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain is a notable anomaly that reduces trust from a domain registration perspective, though the website content and branding strongly support legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and privacy-conscious, serving a specialized technology market. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and resolving WHOIS registration inconsistencies to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching telular.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Telular operates as a specialized IoT solutions provider within the technology and telecommunications sectors, focusing on commercial telematics, security, and home automation. Its parent company, AMETEK, Inc., is a well-established industrial conglomerate, lending credibility and resources. Telular's business model centers on delivering integrated hardware and SaaS solutions for industrial IoT applications, targeting commercial customers requiring reliable telematics and security services. The company benefits from a loyal customer base and a culture of innovation, positioning it as a market leader in its niche. Partnerships with related domains such as SkyBitz and Telguard indicate a collaborative ecosystem enhancing its service offerings. The website content and structure support a medium-sized enterprise with a clear focus on technology-driven growth and customer success.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS usage and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception. The WHOIS data anomaly raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be addressed to strengthen trust. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional HTTP security headers and publishing formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Telular Corporation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Telular Corporation
Description
A culture of innovation and a dedication to telular customer success has put the company in a favorable growth position based on a large and loyal customer base and an ever increasing number of applications for its solutions.
Key services
IoT solutions, Commercial telematics, Security, Home automation, Turnkey industrial IoT solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap 4, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Sitecore CMS, Moment.js, Lodash, Backbone.js, Hammer.js, Typeahead.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4, Sitecore
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Content focuses on IoT innovation and commercial telematics
  3. Strong branding association with AMETEK, Inc.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  5. No security policy or incident response information publicly available
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in WHOIS database
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust technical stack featuring Sitecore CMS, Bootstrap 4 for responsive design, and a suite of modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Backbone.js, and Lodash. Analytics are managed via Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager, while privacy compliance is supported by OneTrust cookie consent tools. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility is basic. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of scripts and assets. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical implementation supports a professional and functional user experience aligned with business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with telular.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review telular.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.