Skip to main content

Security report for telema.com

Telema AS · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Telema AS is a well-established technology company specializing in Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) and e-invoicing services, primarily serving the Baltic region. With over 25 years of market presence and a strong reputation as a market leader, Telema offers automated business document exchange solutions that enhance operational efficiency for its clients. The company maintains a robust partnership ecosystem with over 40 certified ERP providers and supports global roaming for document exchange. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and libraries, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security-wise, Telema demonstrates a solid posture with ISO 27001 certification and HTTPS enforcement, although some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website reflects a credible and professional business with strong trust indicators and a mature digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching telema.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Telema's market positioning as the leading EDI operator in the Baltics is supported by its extensive partner network and long-standing domain registration. The business model focuses on providing seamless integration and onboarding services for ERP systems, targeting medium-sized businesses requiring efficient document exchange. Revenue streams likely include subscription or transaction-based fees for EDI services. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics tools extensively, indicating a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention. Strategic partnerships and roaming capabilities expand their market reach beyond the Baltics. The presence of customer testimonials and certifications further strengthens their competitive advantage.

Security posture

Telema exhibits a mature security posture with ISO 27001 certified hosting and enforced HTTPS. The website implements cookie consent and uses anti-spam measures on forms. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could enhance DNS security. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are publicly available, which may limit transparency in security incident handling. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be enhanced to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Provide explicit incident response contact information to facilitate security communication.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Telema AS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Telema AS
Description
Telema is the leading EDI and e-invoicing operator in the Baltics, providing electronic data interchange services to automate business document exchange between ERP systems.
Key services
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), E-invoicing, Partner onboarding, Roaming document exchange
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.7, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Owl Carousel, Font Awesome, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ISO 27001 certified hosting
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Secure form with honeypot anti-spam

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Ads
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite PRO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration
  2. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot
  3. Multiple language versions available for Baltic region
  4. Contact form uses Gravity Forms with anti-spam honeypot
  5. ISO 27001 certification prominently displayed
  6. Active social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn
  7. No visible security headers beyond HTTPS
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. No explicit incident response contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a combination of well-known libraries and plugins such as Gravity Forms, Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery, AOS, and Owl Carousel. SEO is enhanced via Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and caching mechanisms in place (WP Rocket). Mobile optimization is good with responsive design. The site integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Ads, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Hosting details are limited but domain name servers point to an Estonian hosting provider consistent with company location. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website with room for security and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with telema.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review telema.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.