Skip to main content

Security report for telecom-paris-alumni.fr

Télécom Paris Alumni · Education · France

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Network security.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Télécom Paris Alumni operates as an alumni association platform serving graduates and students of Télécom Paris. The website provides networking opportunities, career services including job and internship offers, event information, and a newsletter subscription. It targets alumni, students, and companies connected to the institution, positioning itself as a medium-sized, established network with over 21,000 members. The business model revolves around membership engagement and service offerings to its community. Technically, the site uses a PHP-based CMS likely related to NetAnswer, with frontend technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, Leaflet.js for maps, and Google Maps API. Hosting is provided by OVH. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO and accessibility basics, though performance data is limited. Security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS, despite having several security headers and a content security policy in place. Cookie consent is implemented with Tarteaucitron, indicating GDPR awareness. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires urgent SSL/TLS improvements to enhance security and trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of telecom-paris-alumni.fr. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching telecom-paris-alumni.fr

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
85
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention telecom-paris-alumni.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
26
Employees
0
Customers
26
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for telecom-paris-alumni.fr.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The alumni association leverages partnerships with platforms like NetAnswer and donation services such as jedonneenligne.org. It maintains a LinkedIn presence and integrates social media for community engagement. The business model is membership-driven, offering value through career support, events, and networking. The site promotes a mobile app to increase engagement. The organization appears focused on maintaining a strong alumni network with services tailored to career advancement and community solidarity. Growth indicators include active job postings and event listings. The partnership ecosystem includes payment processors and authentication providers, reflecting a mature operational environment.

Security posture

The website demonstrates moderate security awareness with multiple HTTP security headers and a content security policy. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS severely undermine the security posture, exposing users to potential interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No vulnerable libraries were detected, and forms use CSRF tokens, indicating some secure development practices. Cookie attributes are set securely with HttpOnly and SameSite flags. The site lacks advanced SSL features like OCSP stapling and session resumption. Incident response and security policies are not publicly documented. Overall, the security maturity is low due to missing HTTPS, which is critical for trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and configure strong cipher suites.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  4. Publish clear security and incident response policies accessible from the website.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct performance optimization to improve user experience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a PHP-based CMS platform, likely NetAnswer, with Apache/2 web server hosting on OVH infrastructure. Frontend technologies include jQuery, Bootstrap, Leaflet.js for interactive maps, Google Maps API, and various JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements. The site uses a cookie consent manager (Tarteaucitron) and integrates multiple analytics and tracking services such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Raygun. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design. However, performance metrics are not available, indicating potential monitoring gaps. The absence of a valid SSL certificate is a significant technical risk. The site uses multiple external domains for social media, analytics, and payment processing, reflecting a complex ecosystem requiring careful security management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with telecom-paris-alumni.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review telecom-paris-alumni.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.