Skip to main content

Security report for tehnolabor.ee

Tehnolabor OÜ · Technology · Estonia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tehnolabor OÜ is a specialized technology development laboratory based in Estonia, focusing on electronics, automation, telecommunication, and industrial solutions. With over 20 years of experience, the company offers comprehensive services from prototype creation to product development and production management. Their portfolio includes projects in healthcare, transportation, and industrial sectors, with notable collaborations such as Airbus and EU-funded research initiatives. The company targets businesses and individuals seeking reliable technology development and automation solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins and modern JavaScript libraries, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with enforced HTTPS, though improvements are needed in security headers and server-side HTTPS enforcement. Privacy compliance is lacking due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website reflects a credible and professional business with room for compliance and security enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tehnolabor.ee

This scan found 32 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tehnolabor holds a niche position in the Estonian and broader European technology development market, leveraging long-term experience and partnerships with research institutions and industry leaders. Their business model emphasizes end-to-end product development, including consulting, prototyping, certification, and production logistics. Revenue streams likely derive from bespoke development projects and product sales. The company maintains a small size but demonstrates strong technical expertise and a diverse project portfolio. Partnerships with entities like Airbus and participation in EU research projects enhance their market credibility. The website content and structure support clear communication of services and expertise, targeting technology companies, healthcare providers, and industrial clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of critical HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The client-side HTTPS redirect is suboptimal and should be replaced with server-side redirects. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are present, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The use of outdated jQuery (1.12.4) may pose risks if not patched. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement server-side HTTPS redirects and remove client-side JavaScript redirect.
  2. Add and configure essential HTTP security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy).
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to latest secure versions.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tehnolabor OÜ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tehnolabor OÜ
Description
Development laboratory specializing in electronics, automation, telecommunication, engineering and R&D, electronics and mechanics design, embedded software development. They create communication, positioning, and other devices combining different technologies.
Key services
Communications technology solutions, Industrial solutions and automation, Simulators, Prototype creation, Product development, Production management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.2.21, jQuery 1.12.4, Flexslider, RevSlider, UT Portfolio plugin, Contact Form 7, Theme My Login plugin, Font Awesome, Google Analytics (ga.js)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
PHP (implied by WordPress), Apache or similar (implied)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced via JavaScript redirect
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of updated WordPress version (5.2.21) and plugins
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional technology development company site with detailed project portfolio.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and standard technologies.
  6. HTTPS is enforced but only via client-side JavaScript redirect, which is suboptimal.
  7. No advanced security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  9. Website content is in English with an option for Estonian language.
  10. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.2.21 with a combination of plugins including RevSlider, UT Portfolio, Contact Form 7, and Theme My Login. The front-end uses jQuery 1.12.4 and Flexslider for UI components. Hosting is provided by Zone Media OÜ, an Estonian registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with standard optimization; mobile responsiveness is good. SEO is supported by meta tags and canonical links. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses Google Analytics for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanisms. Technical debt includes outdated jQuery and lack of server-side HTTPS enforcement. Modernization opportunities include upgrading libraries, improving security headers, and enhancing privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tehnolabor.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tehnolabor.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.