Skip to main content

Security report for tedalos.net

TeDaLoS GmbH · Technology · Austria

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TeDaLoS GmbH is a small Austrian technology company specializing in cloud-based smart inventory monitoring solutions leveraging IoT devices. Their SaaS platform targets end users, technical wholesalers, and sensor manufacturers, providing real-time stock and consumption data to optimize supply chain and warehouse management. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and consistent with the company's business focus. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with modern plugins for SEO, spam protection, and cookie consent, but lacks a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which significantly impacts security posture. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the business appears legitimate and trustworthy, but the lack of HTTPS is a critical security gap that should be addressed promptly.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tedalos.net

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
25
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tedalos.net, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for tedalos.net right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TeDaLoS operates in the technology sector, focusing on IoT-enabled inventory management solutions. Their business model is SaaS-based, offering a flexible cloud platform that integrates various sensor technologies without requiring deep IT integration. The company targets multiple customer segments including end users, wholesalers, and hardware manufacturers, positioning itself as a bridge between analog inventory and digital supply chain systems. Partnerships with Austrian organizations like WKO and FFG enhance credibility. The website content and testimonials indicate a customer-centric approach emphasizing ease of use, flexibility, and rapid deployment. The company was founded around 2017 and maintains a consistent brand presence online.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, exposing users to potential interception risks. While some security best practices are implemented, such as HSTS header presence and anti-spam measures via CleanTalk, the lack of TLS protocols and strong cipher suites is a major vulnerability. Cookie consent and privacy policies are well managed, and Matomo analytics is configured to minimize tracking risks. No evidence of incident response or security policy documentation was found. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS configuration is recommended to improve security and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Configure the web server to support modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and strong cipher suites.
  3. Enhance HSTS policy by including subdomains and enabling preload to enforce HTTPS.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  5. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  6. Consider publishing a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TeDaLoS GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with PHP 8.2.28 running on an nginx server managed via Plesk. It uses popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization, WPBakery Page Builder for layout, LayerSlider for animations, CleanTalk for spam protection, Borlabs Cookie for GDPR-compliant cookie management, and Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. However, performance metrics are unavailable, and the lack of HTTPS is a significant technical deficiency. The site integrates multiple external resources and social media links, primarily LinkedIn. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires urgent security upgrades.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tedalos.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tedalos.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.