Skip to main content

Security report for ted.com

TED Conferences LLC · Education · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TED Conferences LLC operates the TED platform, a globally recognized nonprofit organization dedicated to spreading ideas through short, powerful talks across a wide range of topics. Founded in 1984, TED has established itself as a leading educational and inspirational media platform, offering free access to high-quality video content and hosting conferences and TEDx events worldwide. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a focus on accessibility, mobile optimization, and user engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 29 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ted.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
70
Email security
72
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ted.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
102,591
Employees
2
Customers
102,452
Third parties
137
Weak passwords
16%

Latest record dated 2025-07-23 · 70 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ted.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –auth.ted.com2025-07-23
  • –auth.ted.com2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TED's market position as a premier educational content provider is supported by its nonprofit business model, leveraging sponsorships, donations, and conference revenues. The platform targets a broad audience including educators, professionals, students, and general knowledge seekers. TED's extensive use of modern web technologies and integrations with marketing and analytics tools indicates a sophisticated digital marketing and user engagement strategy. The absence of direct contact information on the main site suggests a focus on digital interaction and brand presence rather than direct sales or support.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configurations and security best practices such as Content Security Policy enforcement and monitoring via New Relic. While no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, the absence of a publicly available security policy and incident response contacts represents an area for improvement. The use of third-party consent management and compliance with GDPR indicates a commitment to privacy and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to enhance trust and transparency.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance contact information availability for business and security inquiries.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating third-party integrations to mitigate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TED Conferences LLC
Description
TED is a nonprofit devoted to spreading ideas, usually in the form of short, powerful talks (18 minutes or less). TED began in 1984 as a conference where Technology, Entertainment and Design converged, and today covers almost all topics — from science to business to global issues — in more than 100 languages.
Key services
TED Talks video platform, TED Conferences, TEDx events, TED-Ed educational content
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, New Relic monitoring, Google DoubleClick ads, Osano CMP, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy event listener present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring tools

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic, Mixpanel, Google Analytics (implied)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
New Relic, Osano CMP, Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
Mixpanel (via VWO integration)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and performance optimization.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact published.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to registry privacy or restrictions.
  7. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The TED website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile responsiveness. Integration with New Relic and other analytics tools provides robust monitoring and user behavior insights. The site uses advanced consent management and A/B testing tools like Osano and Visual Website Optimizer, reflecting a mature approach to user experience optimization. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary content management solution. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience with scalable and secure architecture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ted.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ted.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.