Skip to main content

Security report for techandme.se

Tech and Me (T&M Hansson IT) · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tech and Me (T&M Hansson IT) is a small Swedish technology-focused website providing pre-configured virtual machines, Linux guides, and tips aimed at making technology easier for users. The site targets tech enthusiasts and IT professionals seeking independence from centralized services. The business model relies on content publishing and donations, supported by a professional WordPress-based infrastructure with social media engagement and a donation mechanism via PayPal. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery, Hotjar analytics, and social sharing plugins, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy policies. WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from improved compliance documentation and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching techandme.se

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in the technology sector, focusing on virtual machines and Linux guides. It leverages content marketing and community donations as revenue streams. The presence of multiple social media channels and a donation system indicates active engagement with its audience. The lack of formal privacy and terms pages suggests an opportunity to enhance compliance and user trust. The partnership with hanssonit.se and use of PayPal for donations indicate a modest but structured business ecosystem. Growth potential lies in expanding content offerings and formalizing compliance and security practices.

Security posture

The site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting awareness of privacy and security. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and establishing vulnerability disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and establish a vulnerability disclosure process to improve incident response readiness.
  4. Verify and correct WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tech and Me (T&M Hansson IT)
Description
Tech and Me (T&M Hansson IT) provides easy-to-setup, pre-configured VMs, Linux guides, tips & tricks and more – to make your life a little bit easier. They write about topics they are passionate about and aim to deliver knowledge to users to become more independent and avoid reliance on services that control data.
Key services
Pre-configured virtual machines (VMs), Linux guides and tips, Downloadable software resources, Blog content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Hotjar, Social Pug (Social sharing plugin), Cookie Law Info plugin, Garfunkel WordPress theme, PayPal donation form
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Cookie Law Info)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Social Pug (social sharing)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. Content is focused on technology, specifically pre-configured virtual machines and Linux guides.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with opt-in/out functionality.
  5. Contact information includes a company email and links to feedback and help pages.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or not found for the domain queried, which is a concern.
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and tracking tools.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
  10. Social media presence is strong with Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and GitHub links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with a modern theme (Garfunkel) and uses popular plugins for cookie consent, social sharing, and analytics (Hotjar). The site loads JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 3.7.1 and integrates external services like Twitter widgets and PayPal for donations. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. No critical technical issues or broken elements were detected. The site could benefit from improved accessibility and security header implementation. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with techandme.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review techandme.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.