Skip to main content

Security report for teamwork.com

Teamwork Crew Ltd. · Technology · Ireland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Teamwork.com is a well-established SaaS platform specializing in project and resource management tailored for client services teams. With over 20,000 teams globally, it offers a comprehensive suite of tools including project planning, resource allocation, financial management, and client communication. The platform integrates additional modules such as help desk, document management, and chat to provide an all-in-one solution. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and rich content aimed at various industries and team types. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks like Vue.js and Nuxt.js, utilizes a headless CMS (Storyblok), and employs advanced A/B testing and analytics tools such as VWO and Google Tag Manager. The site is optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, ensuring a high-quality user experience. From a security perspective, Teamwork.com demonstrates strong practices including HTTPS enforcement, SOC 2 Type 2 certification, and implementation of security headers. Privacy compliance is evident with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, along with consent mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposures were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, Teamwork.com presents a low-risk profile with robust business credibility, technical sophistication, and a strong security posture. Strategic recommendations include maintaining up-to-date security measures, enhancing incident response visibility, and establishing a public vulnerability disclosure policy to further strengthen trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of teamwork.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teamwork.com

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
87
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Teamwork.com holds a strong market position as a comprehensive project and resource management platform for client services. Its SaaS business model targets professional teams across industries such as IT services, marketing agencies, consulting, and product development. The company benefits from a broad partnership ecosystem and offers extensive integrations, enhancing its competitive advantage. The presence of customer testimonials and detailed use cases indicates a focus on customer success and retention. The company is medium-sized, founded in 2007, and headquartered in Ireland, with consistent domain registration data supporting its legitimacy.

Security posture

The security maturity of Teamwork.com is high, supported by SOC 2 Type 2 certification and adherence to best practices such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers. The site does not expose sensitive data in its HTML content and employs cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. While no explicit incident response contacts were found, the overall security framework suggests readiness and compliance. The use of third-party analytics and A/B testing tools is managed with privacy considerations. No critical vulnerabilities or compliance gaps were identified in the current analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Maintain regular security audits and timely patching of all software components.
  2. Publish a clear and accessible vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance visibility of incident response contacts, including dedicated security and abuse email addresses.
  4. Continue to monitor and update privacy compliance measures in line with evolving regulations.
  5. Invest in ongoing user education and security culture to mitigate social engineering risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Teamwork Crew Ltd.
Description
Teamwork.com Project Management Software is a platform for delivering client work built with project management at its core. Over 20,000 teams around the world use Teamwork.com's software to manage their daily workflows for improved automation, productivity, and profitability. Teamwork.com’s complete solution includes tracking, managing, billing, and project planning, along with add-ons like Desk (Help desk software), Spaces (document management), and Chat.
Key services
Project management, Resource management, Financial management, Client management, Help desk (Desk), Document management (Spaces), Chat
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, Nuxt.js, Storyblok CMS, VWO (Visual Website Optimizer) for A/B testing, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Wistia (video hosting)
Frameworks
Vue.js, Nuxt.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • SOC 2 Type 2 certification
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, VWO, HubSpot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
VWO, HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot, VWO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and rich content.
  2. Strong focus on project and resource management for client services.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and A/B testing tools.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. Active social media presence and customer testimonials enhance trust.
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges; full content accessible.
  7. Security posture is strong with SOC 2 Type 2 certification and HTTPS.
  8. Contact information is available with sales phone and email.
  9. Multiple integrations and use case scenarios presented clearly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Vue.js and Nuxt.js frameworks, with content managed via Storyblok CMS. It integrates advanced analytics and A/B testing tools such as VWO and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Performance optimizations and responsive design ensure fast loading and excellent mobile usability. The technical implementation reflects a well-maintained infrastructure with no apparent technical debt or outdated components. Opportunities exist to further enhance accessibility and expand automation in deployment and monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 85/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teamwork.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teamwork.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.