Skip to main content

Security report for teamsoft.sk

Team-SOFT s.r.o. · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Team-SOFT s.r.o. is a Slovak technology company specializing in ERP solutions, mobile and web application development, and consulting services primarily targeting small and medium-sized enterprises. Established in 1995, the company has a long-standing presence in the Slovak market and offers a range of products including ERP systems and mobile apps tailored to business needs. The website reflects a professional business with clear service offerings and contact information. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, supports mobile platforms, and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. However, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for compliance and security posture. The domain registration data aligns well with the company's claims, indicating legitimacy and stability. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teamsoft.sk

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector with a focus on ERP and mobile/web application development. Its business model revolves around software development and consulting for small and medium enterprises. The firm benefits from a long operational history and a consistent brand presence. Key competitive advantages include a diversified product portfolio and expertise in multiple programming languages and platforms. The target customers are SMEs in Slovakia and potentially neighboring regions. The company maintains active social media profiles, enhancing its market visibility. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. Growth indicators include continuous product offerings and mobile app presence on Google Play. The company could enhance its market position by improving transparency around privacy and security.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with no visible exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are standard best practices. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL configuration details in the provided data, which is a concern. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of a vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact reduce compliance and security readiness. Google Analytics is used without visible cookie consent, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in policy transparency, header implementation, and secure communication enforcement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add and enforce HTTPS across the entire website and verify SSL/TLS configuration for best practices.
  3. Configure and deploy essential security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact channels.
  5. Integrate a cookie consent mechanism to inform users about tracking and data collection practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Team-SOFT s.r.o.
VAT number
SK2020437639
Registration number
31629482
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Team-SOFT s.r.o.
Description
Team-SOFT s.r.o. provides comprehensive ERP solutions for small and medium-sized companies, develops mobile and web applications including custom solutions and complementary tools to enterprise systems.
Key services
ERP solutions, Mobile application development, Web application development, Consulting services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Progress OpenEdge (mentioned for app development), .NET (mentioned), Java (mentioned), SQL/noSQL (mentioned)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web, Android, iOS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy or cookie policies found on the website.
  2. No terms of service or security policies published.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, fax, email, and physical address.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Google Plus.
  5. Website uses common web technologies and frameworks but lacks advanced security headers.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  7. No forms detected on the homepage; no data collection forms present.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. WHOIS data confirms long-term domain ownership consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Font Awesome for icons. It uses Google Fonts for typography and includes Google Analytics for traffic monitoring. The site supports mobile platforms and mentions development in Progress OpenEdge, .NET, Java, and SQL/noSQL databases for backend applications. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Accessibility is basic with some support for older browsers via HTML5 shims. SEO is basic with meta description and viewport tags but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of visible HTTPS enforcement. Modernization opportunities include adding accessibility improvements, SEO enhancements, and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teamsoft.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teamsoft.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.