Skip to main content

Security report for teamquest.com

Fortra, LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fortra, LLC operates the website teamquest.com, focusing on IT operations management solutions under the Vityl product line. The company provides enterprise-grade software and services that enable organizations to monitor IT infrastructure, optimize capacity, and ensure service availability. Their offerings include performance optimization software and IT service monitoring with business insights, targeting IT and business leaders in medium to large enterprises. The website reflects a mature enterprise with consistent branding and a professional digital presence. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10 with modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and integrates advanced tools like Google Tag Manager and TrustArc for privacy compliance. The site is mobile optimized, accessible, and SEO friendly, though performance is moderate. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent management, but could be improved with additional security headers and public vulnerability disclosure. The security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Contact information is readily available, enhancing trust and business credibility. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access and analysis. Overall, the website demonstrates a strong enterprise presence with good technical and security maturity. Strategic improvements could focus on enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and adding a vulnerability disclosure policy to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teamquest.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
55
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fortra is positioned as an established enterprise software provider specializing in IT operations management and cybersecurity solutions. Their business model revolves around delivering software products and managed services to medium and large enterprises. The company leverages a broad portfolio including Vityl for IT performance optimization and other cybersecurity products. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, subscriptions, and professional services such as penetration testing and managed security. The target customer segments are IT and business leaders seeking to optimize IT infrastructure and security. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem and digital presence, indicating strategic market positioning and growth focus.

Security posture

The website and company demonstrate a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent management via TrustArc, and integration of Google Tag Manager with consent awareness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of public vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts represent areas for improvement. GDPR compliance is evident through privacy policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized disclosure practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a publicly accessible vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and demonstrate security maturity.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) on the website to facilitate communication in case of security incidents.
  4. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations and enhance user trust.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities proactively.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fortra, LLC
Description
Vityl is a powerful IT operations management solution suite that helps monitor key systems, ensure capacity needs are met, and analyze resource requirements through dynamic dashboards and real-time monitoring.
Key services
IT performance optimization software, IT service monitoring with business insights, Penetration testing services, Managed security services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Google Tag Manager, TrustArc Consent Management, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), SPLINE Viewer
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management via TrustArc
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent integration
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with required fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer, TrustArc Consent Manager
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on IT operations management and cybersecurity solutions.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with TrustArc integration.
  4. Multiple contact channels including email, phone, and contact forms.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Drupal 10).
  6. Social media presence on major platforms.
  7. No explicit terms of service page found.
  8. No public vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, leveraging modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery. It integrates third-party tools including Google Tag Manager for analytics and Visual Website Optimizer for A/B testing and optimization. TrustArc is used for comprehensive cookie consent management, indicating a focus on privacy compliance. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, suggesting potential for optimization. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and compliant enterprise web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teamquest.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teamquest.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.