Skip to main content

Security report for teamnetsol.com

Team Netsol Limited · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Team Netsol Limited is a UK-based technology company specializing in AI-powered no-code platforms, primarily through their flagship product BECS Studio. The platform enables business experts and government organizations to rapidly build and deploy digital services without programming, integrating with key UK government services such as GOV.UK Pay and Notify. Positioned as a Crown Commercial Supplier, Team Netsol targets public sector and customer-focused organizations aiming to improve service delivery and reduce digital transformation costs. The company emphasizes open source technology and GDPR compliance, reflecting a modern approach to software development and data privacy. Technically, the website is built on a modern Webflow CMS platform, leveraging Google reCAPTCHA for form security, Hotjar and Google Tag Manager for analytics, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The site demonstrates excellent design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, indicating a mature digital presence. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and certifications suggest a legitimate business. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses CAPTCHA on forms, and provides cookie consent with opt-in options. Certifications such as Cyber Essentials Plus and Crown Commercial Supplier status enhance trust. Nonetheless, the lack of a published security policy, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and could be improved to strengthen security posture. Overall, Team Netsol presents a professional and trustworthy digital front with strong business and technical foundations. The primary risk lies in the missing WHOIS data, which should be investigated to confirm domain registration legitimacy. Strategic improvements in security transparency and formal policies would further enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teamnetsol.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Team Netsol operates in the technology sector with a focus on government and public sector digital transformation. Their competitive advantage lies in delivering an AI-powered no-code platform that simplifies service creation and integrates with UK government payment and notification systems. The business model combines SaaS offerings with professional services and support, targeting government agencies and customer-centric organizations. The company’s Crown Commercial Supplier status and Cyber Essentials Plus certification position it well within the UK public sector procurement ecosystem. Growth indicators include a published product roadmap and active social media presence. Partnerships with government digital marketplaces enhance market reach. The company maintains a small size but demonstrates a clear strategic focus on digital transformation and AI-driven service automation.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced, CAPTCHA protection on forms, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent. Certifications such as Cyber Essentials Plus indicate adherence to recognized security standards. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness visibility. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP header security controls. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced documentation and security best practices implementation to meet higher compliance standards such as ISO 27001 or NIST.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Add security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce trust concerns.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Team Netsol Limited
Registration number
03697370
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Team Netsol Limited
Description
Technology solutions that empower customer focused organisations to improve people's lives. BECS Studio is an AI-powered no-code platform that empowers business experts to rapidly build and publish online services without programming.
Key services
BECS Studio no-code AI platform, Digital transformation consulting, Integration with GOV.UK Pay, Notify, OS AddressBase, Support and professional services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google reCAPTCHA, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Finsweet Cookie Consent, Open Source Software stack (per JSON-LD)
Frameworks
Webflow, Google reCAPTCHA
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Professional business website for a UK-based technology company
  2. Strong focus on AI-powered no-code platform for government and business digital services
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics
  4. Compliant cookie consent and privacy policies present
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information published
  7. No terms of service page found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, Hotjar and Google Tag Manager for analytics, and a cookie consent tool with opt-in capabilities. Hosting is via Webflow’s CDN, ensuring fast load times and good performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data describing the software application and organization. The technical stack is modern and well maintained, though the lack of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent minor technical risks. Overall, the infrastructure supports a professional and performant digital presence suitable for the company’s business objectives.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teamnetsol.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teamnetsol.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.