Skip to main content

Security report for teaminternet.com

Team Internet SAS · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Team Internet SAS is a well-established global internet group specializing in domain and web services, with a history spanning over 29 years. The company focuses on creating meaningful connections between businesses, domains, brands, consumers, publishers, and advertisers. Their market position is strong within the technology sector, offering a broad range of services including brand services, registry, reseller, retail, and search solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting business clients and domain owners worldwide. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, leveraging modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, and CookieYes for consent management. Hosting is provided via Amazon Web Services, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. The site is optimized for mobile devices, accessibility, and SEO, with comprehensive metadata and structured data enhancing search visibility. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong security headers and employs bot protection mechanisms. Cookie consent is granular and GDPR compliant, reflecting a mature privacy posture. However, the absence of a security.txt file and explicit incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in vulnerability disclosure and incident management readiness. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, security, and compliance, supporting the company's credibility and trustworthiness in the internet services market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teaminternet.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
35
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention teaminternet.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
0%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for teaminternet.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Team Internet operates in the technology sector, focusing on domain and internet services with a recurring revenue model. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive service portfolio and long-standing industry presence. The business targets a diverse customer base including domain registrants, brands, publishers, and advertisers. Growth indicators include a comprehensive investor relations section and ESG commitments. The company maintains partnerships visible through social media and Wikipedia references, reinforcing market credibility. Strategic observations highlight a focus on compliance, customer trust, and digital maturity, positioning Team Internet as a key player in the domain services ecosystem.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, robust security headers, and bot mitigation via Google reCAPTCHA. Cookie management is transparent and user-consent driven, aligning with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of a published security.txt and incident response contact emails limits the site's readiness for coordinated vulnerability disclosure and incident handling. Compliance with ISO 27001 is indicated, enhancing trust. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalized incident response communication channels.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user trust by showcasing certifications or security badges on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Team Internet SAS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Team Internet SAS
Description
Team Internet is the global internet group that generates recurring revenue from creating meaningful and successful connections: businesses to domains, brands to consumers, publishers to advertisers. In 2025, Team Internet (formerly CentralNic) celebrates 29 years in the domain and web services industry.
Key services
Domain services, Brand services, Registry services, Reseller services, Retail services, Search services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, CookieYes consent management, Amazon Web Services (DNS and load balancing)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
AWS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent with granular categories
  • Session management cookies with security attributes
  • Cloudflare Bot Management cookies present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with strong security headers
  2. Cookie consent is detailed and GDPR compliant
  3. Structured data is implemented with organization info
  4. Multiple navigation menus for desktop and mobile
  5. Use of modern fonts and responsive design
  6. No signs of phishing or malware
  7. No exposed sensitive data or credentials
  8. No security.txt or explicit incident response contacts found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with Yoast SEO plugin integration, ensuring strong SEO capabilities. Hosting on AWS provides scalability and reliability. The use of Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA indicates advanced tracking and security measures. Performance is optimized with preconnect and preload directives, and fonts are loaded efficiently from Google Fonts. The site is fully responsive with good accessibility features. Technical risks are minimal, though continuous monitoring of plugin updates and third-party scripts is advised to avoid potential vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100 +3Medium37 findingsView report
  2. 55/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teaminternet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teaminternet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.