Skip to main content

Security report for teamdynamix.com

TeamDynamix · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TeamDynamix operates as an enterprise-focused technology company specializing in IT Service Management (ITSM) and workflow automation solutions. Their website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence, targeting organizations seeking to streamline IT and enterprise service processes. The company leverages modern web technologies including WordPress with Elementor, integrated with multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Demandbase, and LinkedIn Insight. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are not clearly published. The absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty about domain registration legitimacy, but the overall website professionalism and branding consistency support business credibility. Strategic improvements in privacy transparency and security disclosures would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teamdynamix.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TeamDynamix positions itself strongly in the ITSM and enterprise workflow automation market, serving medium to large enterprises. Their business model is B2B SaaS with a focus on ITIL-aligned service desks and automation platforms. The company maintains an active partner ecosystem and community engagement, as evidenced by dedicated partner and community portals. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, subscriptions, and professional services. The website content and linked social media channels indicate a mature organization with a consistent brand and market presence. Growth indicators include active marketing campaigns and integration with multiple advertising and analytics platforms.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and a functional cookie consent banner supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit privacy policy or incident response contacts were found, which are important for compliance and user trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced with additional best practices and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly linked from the homepage.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear contact information for data protection officer or privacy inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to minimize privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TeamDynamix
Description
Synchronize your enterprise with workflow automation - when everyone and everything works together you can aim higher and get there faster.
Key services
IT Service Management (ITSM), Workflow Automation, Enterprise Service Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Demandbase, Reddit Ads Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Elementor (WordPress page builder)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, Demandbase, Bing Ads, Reddit Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Demandbase, LinkedIn Insight, Bing Ads, Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and functional.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Social media presence is linked and consistent with company branding.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for an established domain.
  7. Website uses modern technologies and SEO best practices.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  10. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, supported by Yoast SEO for search optimization. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts including Google Analytics, Demandbase, LinkedIn Insight, Bing Ads, and Reddit Pixel, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts. No hosting provider information was directly detected. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy disclosures to reduce technical debt and compliance risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teamdynamix.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teamdynamix.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.