Skip to main content

Security report for team3.lv

Team3 Sia · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Team3 Sia is a Latvian software development company specializing in programming services for small and medium-sized businesses since 2009. Their offerings include website development, e-commerce solutions, and mobile application development for Android and iPhone platforms. The company emphasizes honesty and client care, maintaining a consistent brand presence and providing clear contact information. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Parallax.js, and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides basic privacy and cookie policies, though lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and form protections. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the website's business information aligns with a legitimate small technology firm in Latvia.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching team3.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention team3.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for team3.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Team3 operates in the technology sector focusing on software development services tailored to small and medium enterprises. Their market position is that of an established local player with international cooperation experience. The business model is service-oriented, generating revenue through custom programming projects. The company targets Latvian SMEs seeking digital transformation and application development. Growth indicators include over a decade of operation and a consistent online presence. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related domains or subsidiaries were identified. Strategic observations suggest a stable, client-focused operation with potential to enhance digital trust through improved security and compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No security headers such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The contact form lacks visible anti-CSRF tokens, posing a potential risk. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, limiting transparency in security management. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via privacy and cookie policies, but no data protection officer or explicit compliance statements were found. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet higher standards and reduce risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add anti-CSRF tokens and input validation to all forms to prevent cross-site request forgery and injection attacks.
  3. Verify and enforce HTTPS with strong TLS configurations and regularly update SSL certificates.
  4. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing GDPR measures and appointing a data protection officer or contact.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Team3 Sia
Registration number
50203034681
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Team3 Sia
Description
Team3 is a Latvian programming company established since 2009, specializing in website, e-commerce, Android and iPhone application development, and connector programs. The company emphasizes honesty and client care, serving small and medium businesses with over 10 years of experience.
Key services
Website development, E-commerce solutions, Android application development, iPhone application development, Connector program development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, Slick carousel, Parallax.js 3.1.0, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external Google Analytics script loaded over HTTPS)
  • Contact form uses POST method (implied by form action '#')

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website content is professional and business-focused.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided and consistent.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response info found.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics.
  9. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  10. No visible security headers or advanced security measures detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but basic technology stack with jQuery 3.3.1, Slick carousel, Parallax.js, and Google Analytics. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for SEO and viewport settings for mobile responsiveness. Performance is moderate with some external dependencies on CDNs. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. The site lacks a CMS indication and hosting provider details are not available. Technical debt appears low but security-related technical improvements are needed. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with team3.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review team3.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.