Skip to main content

Security report for tealium.com

Tealium Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tealium Inc. is a well-established enterprise founded in 2007, specializing in real-time customer data integration and management through its Customer Data Platform (CDP) and tag management solutions. Positioned as a leader in the market, recognized by Gartner's Magic Quadrant, Tealium serves a global enterprise audience with a comprehensive suite of products designed to unify, activate, and leverage customer data across multiple touchpoints in real-time. Their offerings include advanced AI data streaming, cloud data activation, and privacy-first healthcare solutions, targeting marketing, IT, and data analytics teams. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Marketo forms, and Tealium's own tag management scripts. The site demonstrates good SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization, with a moderate performance profile. Hosting and domain registration are consistent with enterprise standards, leveraging Amazon Registrar and AWS DNS infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and a published security.txt file. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear policies and GDPR adherence. Contact information is transparent, including phone and physical address, enhancing business credibility. Overall, Tealium's website reflects a mature, professional, and trustworthy enterprise with a strong market position in customer data platforms. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing vulnerability disclosure policies, and enabling DNSSEC to further strengthen security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tealium.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tealium.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
116
Employees
0
Customers
111
Third parties
5
Weak passwords
7%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tealium.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tealium operates in the technology sector, focusing on customer data platforms and real-time data management solutions. Their business model is B2B SaaS, targeting enterprises needing advanced data integration and activation capabilities. The company benefits from a strong partner ecosystem, including AWS, and maintains a leadership position validated by Gartner. Revenue streams likely include subscription-based software licenses and professional services. The website content and case studies indicate a focus on large enterprises across multiple industries such as healthcare, finance, retail, and automotive. Growth indicators include recent product innovations like AIStream and strategic collaborations with cloud providers. The company maintains a comprehensive resource library, developer documentation, and customer success programs, supporting a robust go-to-market strategy.

Security posture

Tealium's security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The presence of cookie consent and privacy policies indicates compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) and lack of a published security.txt file suggest areas for improvement. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security issues. The domain registration is transparent and consistent with the business identity, reducing risk of impersonation. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
  4. Provide explicit incident response and abuse contact channels on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tealium Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tealium Inc.
Description
Tealium is a leader in real-time customer data integration and management, offering a comprehensive suite of solutions and insights to drive meaningful customer experiences. They empower businesses to connect, manage, and leverage data across every touchpoint in real-time.
Key services
Real-Time Data Collection & Quality, Real-Time CDP & Predictive Insights, Data Management & Storage, AIStream™ for AI data streaming, CloudStream™ for data activation, Tealium Moments for customer experience management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Marketo Forms, CookieConsent v3.1.0, jQuery 3.7.1, Yoast SEO Premium, Tealium Tag Management (utag.js), Swiper.js
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async scripts to improve performance
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Tealium Tag Management
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Tealium Tag Management
Marketing tools
Marketo Forms, Tealium Tag Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong emphasis on real-time customer data platform solutions.
  3. Multiple language versions available indicating global reach.
  4. Active use of marketing automation and analytics tools.
  5. Clear contact information and multiple customer engagement channels.
  6. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  7. Good privacy and cookie compliance with consent mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern and well-maintained technology stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Marketo forms, and Tealium's proprietary tag management scripts. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to optimize performance. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO Premium plugin with comprehensive metadata and structured data (JSON-LD). The site is mobile responsive and accessible with clear navigation and multilingual support. Hosting is via Amazon Registrar with AWS DNS servers, indicating reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with some images and scripts showing lazy loading. There is room for improvement in security headers and DNS security. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable digital presence aligned with enterprise standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 84/100 −1Low22 findingsView report
  2. 85/100Low19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tealium.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tealium.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.