Skip to main content

Security report for tandfonline.com

Informa UK Limited · Education · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Taylor & Francis Online is a leading academic publishing platform operated by Informa UK Limited, providing access to millions of peer-reviewed journal articles across multiple disciplines. The platform serves researchers, authors, librarians, editors, and societies with a comprehensive suite of publishing and discovery services. The website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, rich content, and consistent branding aligned with a major global publisher. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Cloudflare CDN, ensuring fast performance, mobile responsiveness, and good SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, multiple security headers, and GDPR-compliant consent management, although explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information is not publicly visible. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is unusual but does not detract significantly from the trustworthiness given the strong external signals and content quality. Overall, the site is safe, well-maintained, and trustworthy for its academic audience.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of tandfonline.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tandfonline.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tandfonline.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
73,043
Employees
0
Customers
72,987
Third parties
56
Weak passwords
7%

54 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tandfonline.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Taylor & Francis Online operates within the education sector as an essential entity under Informa UK Limited. It holds a strong market position as a global academic publisher with a broad portfolio of journals and open access options. The business model centers on subscription and open access publishing, author services, and partnerships with societies. The platform's extensive content and user base indicate a large enterprise scale. The company leverages partnerships and related domains to enhance service offerings. Growth indicators include active content updates, trending research highlights, and engagement tools. The ecosystem includes multiple service domains supporting authors and editors, reflecting a mature and integrated publishing operation.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and a consent management system aligned with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of publicly accessible security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs suggests areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces a moderate tracking footprint, balanced by consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced communication of security governance and incident handling.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance visibility of contact information for security and privacy concerns.
  5. Continue to monitor and optimize privacy compliance, especially with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Informa UK Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Informa UK Limited
Description
Search and explore the millions of quality, peer-reviewed journal articles published under the Taylor & Francis, Routledge and Dove Medical Press imprints.
Key services
Peer-reviewed journal articles, Open access publishing, Author services, Journal browsing and discovery
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Pingdom RUM, Cloudflare Insights, Altmetric embed, Optimizely, Transcend Consent Manager
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Consent management for GDPR
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Pingdom RUM, Altmetric
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Doceree
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Pingdom RUM, Altmetric
Marketing tools
Optimizely
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional academic publishing platform for Taylor & Francis.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and targeted at researchers, authors, librarians, editors, and societies.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  4. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools with moderate user tracking.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the homepage HTML.
  6. No visible security incident response or vulnerability disclosure pages.
  7. WHOIS data is missing or not publicly available, which is unusual but not uncommon for large publishers using privacy services.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Cloudflare CDN, ensuring fast load times and robust performance. The CMS appears to be a proprietary or custom platform, likely Literatum, tailored for academic publishing. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO features. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. Technical risks are minimal, with no visible outdated or vulnerable libraries. Opportunities exist to further modernize by adopting newer JavaScript frameworks or enhancing accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tandfonline.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tandfonline.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.