Skip to main content

Security report for talentator.com

Talentator · Education · Lithuania

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Talentator is a Lithuanian-based digital learning partner specializing in creating and implementing tailored e-learning solutions, including custom e-courses, e-learning libraries, and learning management systems (LMS). The company targets businesses seeking to enhance employee training through digital transformation. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern plugins such as WPBakery and Slider Revolution, and it incorporates SEO best practices and structured data for enhanced search visibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no obvious vulnerabilities, though additional security headers could improve defenses. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no clear privacy policy or terms of service pages detected. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, impacting trustworthiness despite the professional web presence. Overall, Talentator presents as a credible small business in the education sector with room for improvement in transparency and privacy documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching talentator.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Talentator operates in the education sector, focusing on digital employee training solutions for corporate clients. Their business model is B2B, offering customized e-learning content, a library of ready-made courses, and LMS platforms to optimize and digitalize training processes. The company appears established since 2015, with a consistent brand and active content marketing through blog posts and social media. They leverage partnerships and integrations with major platforms like Facebook and Google Analytics for marketing and analytics. The lack of visible contact details and privacy policies may limit customer trust and regulatory compliance. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found, indicating an independent small-sized enterprise. The company’s market position is likely regional with a focus on Lithuanian businesses.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. However, several important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, which could expose the site to clickjacking or MIME sniffing attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. Forms appear to be standard with no immediate signs of insecure input handling, but no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published. The cookie consent banner indicates some level of privacy awareness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing additional HTTP headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Disclose contact information including emails and phone numbers clearly on the website for business credibility.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and update WordPress core and plugins promptly to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Talentator
Description
Talentator – skaitmeninis ugdymo partneris, padedantis kurti Jūsų įmonės pokytį, siūlantis platų spektrą skaitmeninių darbuotojų ugdymo sprendimų.
Key services
E. mokymų kūrimas, E-mokymų biblioteka, Ugdymo valdymo sistemos (LMS)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Slider Revolution, WPBakery Page Builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (implied by cookie consent)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  5. Uses modern WordPress plugins and SEO best practices
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using popular plugins like WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. It uses jQuery and Google Analytics for interactivity and tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with some heavy multimedia content such as videos. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional digital presence but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with talentator.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review talentator.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.