Skip to main content

Security report for tagore.se

Tagore · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tagore is a Swedish IT consulting company specializing in helping organizations achieve tangible results from their IT investments by translating strategies into operational actions. The company positions itself as an independent advisor with deep expertise in both IT and management, targeting businesses seeking clarity and effective execution in complex IT environments. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand with a focus on trust and operational success. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries and is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, combined with extensive use of tracking scripts without consent mechanisms, indicates gaps in privacy compliance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some security headers and published security policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tagore.se

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tagore operates in the technology consulting sector with a niche focus on IT investment advisory and strategy implementation. Their competitive advantage lies in their independence and dual expertise bridging IT and management consulting. The business model revolves around consulting services aimed at improving IT project outcomes for clients. The company targets medium to large enterprises in Sweden, emphasizing trust and operational delivery. Their marketing ecosystem includes LinkedIn presence and content marketing via blogs. The company has been established since 2013, indicating stable market presence. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. Growth indicators include active content updates and a decade-long anniversary celebration. Strategic observations suggest a focus on maintaining independence and deep client relationships.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. Extensive use of third-party tracking scripts without cookie consent mechanisms poses privacy compliance risks under GDPR. No known vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response readiness and data protection officer contact information are not provided, indicating potential compliance gaps. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with better policy publication and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy on the website.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  4. Publish a security policy and provide incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  5. Regularly audit and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve site performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tagore AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tagore
Description
Vi hjälper er att nå resultat för era it-investeringar. Vi ser till att omsätta strategier i rätt operativ handling och skapar därmed goda förutsättningar för att din it-investering ska nå sina mål.
Key services
IT investment advisory, Strategy implementation, Operational IT consulting, Decision support for IT investments
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, jQuery, Flexslider, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Google Fonts
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URLs use https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage
  3. Contact information includes physical addresses and a company email
  4. No phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contact found
  5. Use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts without visible cookie consent
  6. Professional and consistent branding and content presentation
  7. SEO optimized with Yoast plugin and proper meta tags
  8. No visible forms on homepage; no data collection fields detected
  9. Security headers not detected in provided data; opportunity for improvement
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with jQuery, Flexslider, and AOS libraries for UI effects. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site uses Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag for analytics and marketing. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and performance but could benefit from further optimization. No broken elements or errors were detected in the HTML. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. The site lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy compliance mechanisms. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but has room for security and privacy improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tagore.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tagore.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.