Skip to main content

Security report for taeggie.com

Taeggie Oy · Technology · Finland

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Taeggie Oy is a Finnish technology company specializing in social media content aggregation and display solutions designed to enhance website engagement and SEO. Their SaaS platform offers multiple subscription tiers tailored to small businesses, large enterprises, and digital agencies, providing features such as social media feed embedding, Instagram story integration, user-generated content monitoring, and reporting analytics. The company positions itself as a niche provider with a clear focus on improving digital presence through social media integration. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking. Hosting and DNS services leverage Cloudflare for DNS management, though DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a minor security gap. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protections in place, but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response or security policies. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy and GDPR considerations, but no cookie consent mechanism is detected. Overall, the website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear business and contact information, supporting a moderate trust level.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of taeggie.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching taeggie.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Taeggie operates in the technology sector, targeting businesses seeking to enhance their websites with dynamic social media content. Their subscription-based business model offers scalable plans from solo users to resellers, indicating a diversified revenue stream. The presence of client logos and free trials suggests active market engagement and customer acquisition strategies. The company maintains a Finnish market focus with multilingual support (Finnish and English). The ecosystem includes integrations with major social media platforms and uses third-party analytics tools. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. The business shows consistency between domain registration and operational claims, supporting credibility and stability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and CSRF tokens implemented in forms, reducing common web vulnerabilities. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduce the overall security robustness. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels were found. User tracking via Google Analytics and Tag Manager is present without a visible cookie consent mechanism, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Taeggie Oy
Description
Taeggie provides social media content aggregation and display solutions to keep websites fresh and engaging, improving SEO and visitor engagement through social media feeds and reporting.
Key services
Social media feed embedding, Instagram story integration, User-generated content monitoring, Reporting and analytics, Event screen social media display
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens implemented in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Lfeeder tracker
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Finnish with English language option.
  3. Multiple social media platforms referenced for content aggregation.
  4. Clear pricing and product offerings with free trial available.
  5. Contact information is provided but no phone number found.
  6. No explicit cookie consent banner detected.
  7. Security headers not explicitly visible in provided data.
  8. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  9. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but relatively simple technology stack centered on jQuery and standard web technologies. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing tracking. Hosting appears to be managed via Cloudflare DNS services, with GoDaddy as the domain registrar. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design with Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and DNS configuration. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with taeggie.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review taeggie.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.