Skip to main content

Security report for tabsfm.com

Tabs FM Ltd · Technology · United Kingdom

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tabs FM Ltd is a UK-based company specializing in advanced Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) and Computer-Aided Facilities Management (CAFM) software solutions. Their products target facilities, estates, and service management sectors, offering modular, scalable software with a focus on compliance, health and safety, maintenance, and asset management. The company serves a diverse clientele including NHS Trusts, educational institutions, charities, and commercial enterprises, positioning itself as a trusted partner with recognized industry standards such as SFG20 integration. Technically, the website employs a mature technology stack including jQuery, Font Awesome, and Google Tag Manager, alongside a cookie consent management system ensuring GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with structured data enhancing search visibility. However, some legacy JavaScript libraries are used, and security headers are not explicitly detected, indicating room for improvement in security hardening. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security policies or incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency, though the website content and business information suggest legitimacy. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content analyzed. Overall, Tabs FM presents a professional and credible online presence with good content quality and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, domain registration transparency, and incident response readiness would enhance their security posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tabsfm.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tabs FM operates in the facilities management software market with a focus on CMMS and CAFM solutions. Their business model includes modular software licensing, cloud and on-premise deployment options, and professional services such as training and support. The company targets public sector organizations, educational institutions, healthcare providers, and commercial enterprises, leveraging partnerships and recognized standards like SFG20 to differentiate themselves. Their digital presence across social media and app stores supports customer engagement and product accessibility. The company appears medium-sized with a UK base and a history dating back to 1995, indicating stability and experience in the sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and others suggests potential gaps in defense-in-depth. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and response. The use of older JavaScript libraries may introduce risks if not regularly updated. Overall, the security posture is adequate but would benefit from enhanced header configurations, published security policies, and a security.txt file to improve transparency and incident management.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Regularly update all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to their latest stable versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to formalize vulnerability disclosure processes and improve trust.
  5. Enhance domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS records are complete and publicly accessible, or provide justification for privacy protection.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tabs FM Ltd
Registration number
02731312
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tabs FM Ltd
Description
Tabs FM offers advanced CMMS and CAFM software designed for effective facilities management, compliance tracking, health and safety, and maintenance efficiency with SFG20 integration.
Key services
CMMS & CAFM software solutions, Project management, Data migration, Training, Software development, Cloud hosting, Technical support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1 and 2.0.3, jQuery UI 1.9.2, Font Awesome 6.0.0-beta3, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js), Consent Manager scripts, Custom JavaScript, Manifest for PWA
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URLs)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Consent Manager
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data
  2. No WAF or blocking detected
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual for an active commercial domain
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present
  5. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  6. Multiple social media and app store links indicate active digital presence
  7. No forms detected in HTML content for direct data collection
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of legacy and modern web technologies, including multiple versions of jQuery and jQuery UI, Font Awesome for icons, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The presence of a manifest file suggests some level of progressive web app (PWA) support. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as screen-reader alerts and adjustable font sizes. Performance is moderate, with external dependencies on multiple CDNs and consent management services. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site architecture. Technical debt is indicated by the use of older JavaScript versions, which should be addressed to reduce security risks and improve maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tabsfm.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tabsfm.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.