Skip to main content

Security report for t1p.de

Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

t1p.de is a German-based URL shortening service that emphasizes security and privacy by integrating malware and phishing protection, password protection for links, and dereferrer functionality. The service offers multiple domain options for short URLs, a browser extension, mobile app, and API access, targeting users who require safe and privacy-conscious link management. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and provides comprehensive information about its services, including terms and privacy policies. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and jQuery UI, with HTTPS enabled and CSRF protection in forms, indicating a solid technical foundation. However, some security best practices like security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing or not visible. The WHOIS data aligns with the website's German origin and service claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional service with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching t1p.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention t1p.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
46
Employees
0
Customers
46
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
50%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for t1p.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, specifically in URL shortening with a niche focus on security and privacy. Its competitive advantage lies in malware and phishing protection integrated into the URL shortening process, along with optional password protection and link deactivation features. Revenue streams likely include premium or enterprise solutions, API access, and possibly donations. The target customers are internet users and businesses seeking secure link management. The presence of multiple related domains suggests a networked approach to URL shortening. The company maintains transparency with accessible terms, privacy, and abuse reporting pages but lacks direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main site. Growth potential exists in expanding enterprise offerings and enhancing privacy compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, CSRF tokens in forms, malware and phishing scanning, and options for password protection and referrer removal. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response is facilitated via an abuse reporting page. GDPR compliance is indicated through a comprehensive privacy policy, but the lack of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing additional headers, formal vulnerability disclosure, and explicit data protection officer contact information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR cookie regulations.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting and transparency.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience across devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
t1p.de ist ein Kurz-URL-Service mit Phishing- und Malware-Schutz, der lange Links zu sicheren Kurz-URLs kürzt.
Key services
URL shortening, Malware and phishing protection, Password protection for links, Link lists (multilinks), Email links, QR code generation, API access, Browser extension and mobile app, Enterprise solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, jQuery Migrate 3.5.2, jQuery UI 1.14.1, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token in forms
  • Malware and phishing link scanning
  • Password protection for links
  • Deactivation links for URLs
  • Referrer removal (dereferrer) option

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a German-based URL shortening service with strong emphasis on security and privacy.
  2. No signs of adult or malicious content.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact via contact form and abuse page.
  4. No cookie consent banner detected despite GDPR compliance claims.
  5. Uses modern JavaScript libraries but no major frameworks detected.
  6. No visible security headers in HTML content; SSL is enabled.
  7. Multiple domain options offered for short URLs indicating a network of related domains.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Good content structure and navigation with multiple options for link creation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and jQuery UI libraries for interactivity and UI components. The HTML is well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO and viewport settings for responsive design, though mobile optimization is basic. The site loads multiple JavaScript and CSS files hosted on the same domain, indicating self-hosted assets. Performance is moderate with no obvious heavy resources. No CMS or major frameworks detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. The presence of CSRF tokens in forms indicates attention to security in form submissions. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced mobile responsiveness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with t1p.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review t1p.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.