Skip to main content

Security report for t-hub.co

T-Hub · Technology · India

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

T-Hub is a leading innovation ecosystem based in India, established in 2015, that connects startups, corporates, academia, investors, and government entities to foster disruptive innovation and entrepreneurship. The website reflects a mature and professional digital presence built on WordPress with Elementor, featuring rich content about their programs, partnerships, and services. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity, supporting moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy compliance is limited, with no visible privacy or cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-positioned in its market segment but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching t-hub.co

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

T-Hub operates as an essential entity in the technology and government sectors, providing a platform for innovation acceleration, corporate collaboration, academic engagement, and government partnerships. Its business model revolves around ecosystem building through programs, co-working spaces, and events. The company maintains partnerships and subsidiaries such as AIC T-Hub, MATH, and T-Recruit, expanding its reach. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on startups and corporates as primary audiences, with a strong emphasis on growth and innovation. The presence of multiple partner domains and international programs suggests a broad and strategic partnership ecosystem. The company appears to have a large operational scale consistent with its domain age and market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and the domain is protected against unauthorized transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents potential vulnerabilities. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are visible, which could impact readiness for security incidents. The use of third-party scripts and analytics tools introduces some risk, though no immediate vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is minimal, lacking cookie consent and privacy policy transparency, which may expose the organization to regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires improvements to align with best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure process to improve security transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
T-Hub
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
T-Hub
Description
T-Hub: India's leading Innovation Ecosystem. T-Hub stands at the epicentre of innovation, connecting startups, corporates, academia, investors, and governments. Its unrivalled impact is forging new paths and leaving a bold footprint in what we define as “disruptive innovation”.
Key services
Startup incubation and acceleration, Corporate innovation facilitation, Academic collaboration, Government partnerships, Co-working spaces, Events and programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Swiper.js, FontAwesome, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, SmatBot chatbot
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Elementor page builder
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
SmatBot chatbot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and rich content.
  2. Strong focus on innovation ecosystem with multiple stakeholder engagement.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy explicitly found on homepage or main menus.
  4. Multiple external partner domains linked, indicating a broad ecosystem.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies visible.
  7. Contact information includes email and physical address with no phone number explicitly labeled.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  9. No GDPR or data protection officer information found.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, supported by modern front-end libraries including jQuery, Swiper.js, and FontAwesome. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user behavior tracking, alongside a chatbot service (SmatBot). The hosting provider is BigRock Solutions Ltd., consistent with the WHOIS data. The site shows good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization with Yoast SEO plugin usage. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization in loading times and accessibility features. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with t-hub.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review t-hub.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.