Systempartner IT-Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG · Technology · Germany
High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 4 other checks.
Systempartner IT-Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG is a well-established IT service provider based in Lüneburg, Germany, with over 25 years of experience. The company specializes in delivering tailored IT infrastructure, security, analysis, telephony solutions (notably 3CX VoIP), refurbished hardware, and cloud services primarily targeting businesses and institutions in Northern Germany. Their strong partnerships with leading technology vendors such as Sophos, Lenovo, Microsoft, and others position them as a trusted regional player with a comprehensive service portfolio. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with active content updates and clear business information. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and uses reputable plugins like Yoast SEO and Borlabs Cookie for SEO and privacy compliance. The hosting appears stable with nameservers linked to Kasserver. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, providing a good user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be enhanced. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security posture is good, with room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is strong, with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent. The domain WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. No WAF or blocking mechanisms interfere with content access. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy and security.txt file, and maintaining regular updates to plugins and themes to sustain security and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk
What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN
Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Port 139 (NetBIOS) is publicly accessible - NetBIOS - Windows file sharing
What to do: Consider restricting access to NetBIOS or implementing strong authentication
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 33 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention systempartner-it.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for systempartner-it.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with systempartner-it.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review systempartner-it.de.