Skip to main content

Security report for synergy.lt

Synergy Consulting · Technology · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Synergy Consulting is a Lithuania-based IT service management and digital transformation company with over 17 years of experience and more than 300 projects completed. They focus on delivering professional consulting services in process design, implementation, and integration, complemented by partnerships with established product vendors such as Ivanti, SM Cloud, and Qualys. The company targets businesses seeking to improve IT service quality and digital maturity. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and FontAwesome, with a responsive design and basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but lacking explicit security headers and incident response policies. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. However, WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website presents a professional and credible business presence with room for security and transparency improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching synergy.lt

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Synergy Consulting holds a solid regional position in the IT consulting sector, emphasizing specialization over breadth. Their business model combines consulting services with product partnerships, enabling diversified revenue streams. The company maintains offices in Lithuania and Latvia, indicating a Baltic regional focus. The partnership ecosystem with recognized IT product vendors enhances their market credibility. Growth indicators include a substantial project portfolio and long operational history. The absence of social media presence and limited marketing tools suggests a focus on direct client engagement rather than broad digital marketing. Strategic observations recommend enhancing domain registration transparency and expanding security and compliance disclosures to strengthen trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage and secure contact form validation. The presence of a cookie consent banner and detailed privacy policy indicates awareness of data protection regulations including GDPR. However, the lack of visible security headers, incident response contacts, vulnerability disclosure policies, and security certifications reveals gaps in comprehensive security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of a security.txt file and incident response contacts limits readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small IT consulting firm but would benefit from enhanced technical controls and transparency to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an explicit security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate preparedness and transparency.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Obtain and display relevant security certifications (e.g., ISO 27001) to strengthen trust and market positioning.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Synergy Consulting UAB
VAT number
LT100001780819
Registration number
300129699
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Synergy Consulting
Description
Synergy Consulting provides IT Service Management and Digital Transformation services focused on process design, implementation, and integration. They offer products from partners like Ivanti, SM Cloud, and Qualys.
Key services
Process Design, Process Implementation, Process Development & Integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Slick Carousel, WOW.js, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage assumed (URL is https)
  • Contact form with validation
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and professionally presented.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent implemented.
  4. Contact information is detailed and includes offices in Lithuania and Latvia.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy found.
  6. No visible social media links present.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL assumed but not verified.
  8. No advertising or analytics scripts detected beyond basic contact form.
  9. Partner products linked externally to reputable domains.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely adopted frontend technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, FontAwesome for icons, and Slick Carousel for sliders. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site is mobile optimized with a clear navigation structure and professional design. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced optimization techniques detected. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the content. The contact form includes client-side validation but lacks visible CAPTCHA or advanced anti-spam measures. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal user tracking, aligning with privacy compliance goals. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential outdated third-party libraries that require monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with synergy.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review synergy.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.