Skip to main content

Security report for survicate.com

Survicate · Technology · Poland

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

90/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Survicate is a well-established technology company founded in 2013, specializing in customer feedback and survey automation solutions. Their platform enables businesses to collect and analyze customer insights across multiple channels, supporting marketing and product development efforts. The company targets businesses seeking to enhance customer experience through data-driven feedback mechanisms. The website reflects a mature SaaS business model with a strong market position in the customer feedback technology sector. Technically, Survicate's website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Mixpanel, Google Analytics, HubSpot, Intercom, and Stripe for payments. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, indicating a high level of digital maturity and technical infrastructure quality. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and employs cookie consent management via Cookiebot, demonstrating compliance with GDPR and privacy best practices. The domain WHOIS data is consistent with the business history and shows domain security measures like clientDeleteProhibited status. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and explicit security headers beyond HTTPS are not clearly identified. No public security policy or incident response contacts were found, which could be improved. Overall, Survicate presents a professional, trustworthy online presence with strong privacy compliance and technical implementation. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main page is noted but common for SaaS platforms relying on web forms and third-party integrations. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing a security policy, and providing incident response contacts to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of survicate.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching survicate.com

This scan found 10 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
85
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
90

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention survicate.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
890
Employees
12
Customers
878
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

Latest record dated 2026-06-12 · 2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for survicate.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –panel.survicate.com2026-06-12
  • –panel.survicate.com2026-06-05
  • –panel.survicate.com2026-05-28
  • –panel.survicate.com2026-05-03
  • –panel.survicate.com2026-02-02

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Survicate operates in the competitive customer feedback and survey SaaS market, leveraging integrations with major platforms like Stripe, LinkedIn, and Intercom to enhance its service offering. Its business model focuses on subscription-based software delivery, targeting medium-sized businesses and enterprises seeking actionable customer insights. The company benefits from a consistent brand presence and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, which support regulatory compliance and customer trust. The partnership ecosystem includes payment processing, marketing automation, and scheduling services, indicating a well-rounded operational strategy. Growth indicators include the use of advanced analytics and marketing tools, and the website's professional design supports strong market positioning.

Security posture

The security posture of Survicate's website is solid, with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. The domain registration includes protective statuses that prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. Use of reputable third-party services for analytics and customer support reduces direct security risks. However, the lack of DNSSEC and explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options or Content-Security-Policy could expose the site to certain risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness perception. Overall, the site demonstrates good security hygiene but could improve in transparency and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Implement and explicitly declare security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Content-Security-Policy.
  4. Consider adding direct company contact information (email/phone) for customer and security inquiries to improve trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Survicate
Description
A customer feedback platform that lets you survey every channel, automate feedback flows, and uncover customer insights from multiple sources
Key services
Customer feedback surveys, Feedback automation, Multi-channel survey deployment, Customer insights analytics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Mixpanel, Google Tag Manager, Intercom, Cookiebot, Stripe, Cloudflare, AWS DNS
Frameworks
Webflow (indicated by w-mod-js classes), Google Tag Manager
Platforms
Web, SaaS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of reputable third-party security and analytics providers
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Mixpanel, Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mixpanel, LinkedIn Insight, G2 Crowd Attribution
Marketing tools
HubSpot Analytics, Intercom, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with Cookiebot
  3. Multiple reputable third-party integrations for analytics and marketing
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on main page
  5. No terms of service page detected
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and detailed
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found
  9. Website content is business-focused and professional
  10. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and integrations including Mixpanel for analytics, Google Tag Manager for tag management, Intercom for customer support chat, and Stripe for payment processing. Hosting and DNS are managed via OVH and AWS DNS servers, indicating reliable infrastructure. The site is optimized for fast loading and mobile responsiveness, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and Open Graph data. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. The technical stack is modern and well-integrated, supporting a seamless user experience and robust data collection capabilities. Opportunities exist to enhance DNS security and explicitly implement security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 90/100Low16 findingsView report
  2. 90/100 +4Low17 findingsView report
  3. 86/100Low17 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with survicate.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review survicate.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.