Skip to main content

Security report for survey-xact.no

Xact · Technology · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SurveyXact is a technology-driven platform focused on survey creation and data collection services, supported by Xact experts who provide daily phone assistance. The website demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity, utilizing modern frontend technologies such as React and Material-UI, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly login experience. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and advanced protections. Privacy and cookie policies are not present on the login page, indicating potential compliance gaps. Overall, the platform appears professional and business-oriented but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching survey-xact.no

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention survey-xact.no, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for survey-xact.no.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SurveyXact operates as a SaaS provider in the survey and data collection sector, targeting business users who require reliable survey tools and expert support. The company leverages partnerships, as indicated by links to rambollxact.com and HubSpot marketing tools, suggesting integration with broader business ecosystems. The business model centers on subscription or usage-based access to survey services, supported by a medium-sized organization likely based in Denmark. Growth potential is supported by professional branding and consistent user experience, though the lack of public domain registration data may affect trust among new customers.

Security posture

The security maturity of SurveyXact is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, securing data in transit, and employs secure input types for login credentials. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit CSRF tokens or advanced anti-forgery mechanisms are visible in the login form. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which may indicate incomplete GDPR compliance. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly documented. The platform should prioritize implementing security headers, explicit CSRF protections, and transparent privacy practices to enhance security and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add explicit CSRF tokens or anti-forgery mechanisms in all forms handling sensitive data.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Obtain and publish WHOIS domain registration data to improve trust and legitimacy.
  5. Establish and publicize incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Xact
Description
SurveyXact is a platform likely offering survey and data collection services, supported by Xact experts available daily by phone.
Key services
Survey creation, Data collection, Customer support
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, jQuery UI 1.13.2, Material-UI (Mui components and styles)
Frameworks
React, Material-UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • Secure password input fields

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
HubSpot (implied by hubspotusercontent domain)
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis.
  3. Website uses modern frontend technologies including React and Material-UI.
  4. Contact phone number is clearly provided for support.
  5. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on login page.
  6. No email addresses or social media links found in the provided content.
  7. External links point to related business and marketing resources.
  8. No explicit security headers or advanced security features detected in HTML.
  9. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern frontend stack with React and Material-UI, supported by jQuery libraries for legacy or UI enhancements. The design is responsive and accessible at a basic level, with clear navigation and professional styling. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading or technical debt. SEO optimization is basic, with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the provided data. The site would benefit from enhanced accessibility features and SEO improvements to increase reach and usability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with survey-xact.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review survey-xact.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.