Skip to main content

Security report for suprnation.io

SuprNation · Technology · Malta

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SuprNation is a Malta-based technology company founded in 2015, specializing in the iGaming industry. It positions itself as an innovator and leader focused on delivering superior mobile casino experiences and creative gaming solutions. The company operates several subsidiary brands including VoodooDreams, NYspins, and Duelz, targeting the online casino market with a focus on user experience and gamification. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and social media presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins and frameworks, but uses outdated software versions that pose security risks. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and explicit policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional and credible but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of suprnation.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching suprnation.io

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets the iGaming sector with a technology-driven business model focused on product innovation and user experience enhancement. Its market position is that of a creative and competent leader aiming to disrupt the industry. The presence of multiple casino brands suggests a diversified product portfolio. The company maintains a physical presence in Malta, a known hub for iGaming businesses, supporting legitimacy. The website content and structure support clear communication of business offerings and contact channels, though lack of formal policies may impact regulatory compliance. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates active marketing and analytics efforts. Partnerships or subsidiaries are clearly identified, supporting ecosystem transparency.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The WordPress core and jQuery versions are outdated, exposing the site to known vulnerabilities. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. Contact information for security incidents is absent. These gaps indicate a moderate security maturity level with room for significant improvement to meet industry best practices and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade WordPress core and all plugins to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy with dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@suprnation.com).
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SuprNation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SuprNation
Description
SuprNation is a technology company founded in 2015 to serve as a home for some of the most competent and creative people in the iGaming industry. Their first product was launched in summer 2016, a casino focused on delivering a better user and gaming experience. They aim to innovate and shake up the iGaming industry.
Key services
Mobile casino platforms, Gaming experience innovation, iGaming product development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.5.2, PHP (implied by WordPress), jQuery 1.12.3, Google Maps API, Slider Revolution, Visual Composer (WPBakery), Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, LightGallery, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Visual Composer page builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled (canonical URLs use https)
  • Google Tag Manager implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based corporate site for an iGaming technology company.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the HTML content.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with physical address, phone, and email.
  4. Social media presence includes Facebook, LinkedIn, and Vimeo.
  5. Use of outdated WordPress and jQuery versions poses security risks.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response contacts.
  7. Google Tag Manager is implemented for analytics and tracking.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.5.2 with Visual Composer and Slider Revolution plugins, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. It uses jQuery 1.12.3 and Google Maps API for interactive features. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses modern fonts and CSS techniques. Performance is moderate, with some potential overhead from legacy scripts. Accessibility is basic, with no explicit ARIA or accessibility features detected. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the HTML content. Overall, the technical stack is common but requires modernization to improve security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 52/100Medium38 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with suprnation.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review suprnation.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.