Skip to main content

Security report for superinteractive.com

Super Interactive · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Super Interactive is a well-established digital studio based in Amsterdam, founded in 2004, specializing in digital product strategy, design, development, and management. The company positions itself as a nimble yet experienced partner for organizations seeking impactful digital solutions. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with clear branding and a focus on user experience. The technical infrastructure is solid, leveraging modern web technologies and hosted via TransIP, with HTTPS enabled and a stable domain registration history. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Overall, the website demonstrates high business credibility and technical maturity but requires enhancements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching superinteractive.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
75
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, targeting organizations needing digital product services. Their business model is product-as-a-service, offering end-to-end digital product lifecycle support. With over 15 years of experience and a portfolio of notable clients, they hold a strong market position in Amsterdam's digital agency landscape. The absence of privacy and cookie policies may impact compliance and client trust in regulated markets. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found in the provided data. The company emphasizes quality, agility, and measurable results, which are reflected in their content and client testimonials.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protections, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly enhanced by adopting recommended security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing clear security and privacy policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and enhance user trust.
  3. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and inform users.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen web security.
  5. Consider publishing a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Super Interactive
Description
Super Interactive is a leading digital studio in Amsterdam for strategy, design and development. They combine the dedication and flexibility of an agile product team with the experience and capacity of a large agency.
Key services
Digital Product Strategy, Digital Product Design, Digital Product Development, Digital Product Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Typekit Fonts, Swiper.js
Frameworks
StimulusJS (data-controller attributes)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and responsive layout.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page or navigation.
  3. Contact information including email, phone, and physical address is clearly presented.
  4. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly identified beyond internal scripts.
  7. Domain uses HTTPS with valid SSL and clientTransferProhibited status.
  8. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security improvement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies, including StimulusJS for frontend interactivity and Typekit for fonts. The site is hosted on TransIP infrastructure with stable DNS and domain registration. Performance appears moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but provides basic responsiveness and navigation clarity. There is no evidence of third-party analytics or tracking services in the provided HTML snippet, indicating minimal user tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with superinteractive.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review superinteractive.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.