Skip to main content

Security report for supercast.tech

Supercast · Technology · Canada

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Supercast.tech is a technology company registered in Canada since 2019. The website currently displays a 404 Not Found error page with minimal content, indicating either a broken link or an under-construction site. The technical infrastructure includes modern frontend technologies such as Tailwind CSS, Turbo (Hotwire), and Stripe.js for payment processing, hosted on AWS infrastructure. However, the site lacks critical content such as privacy policies, terms of service, and contact information, which negatively impacts user trust and compliance. Security posture is weak with no visible security headers and DNSSEC not enabled, though the domain registration is transparent and consistent with the business identity. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in content availability, security practices, and compliance documentation to enhance credibility and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching supercast.tech

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
40
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention supercast.tech, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
12
Employees
0
Customers
12
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for supercast.tech.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Supercast appears to be a small technology company focused on digital services, possibly related to podcasting or media given the brand name, though no explicit business description is present on the site. The domain age and registration details align with a legitimate startup or SME. The company uses third-party services like Stripe for payments and Mixpanel for analytics, indicating a SaaS or subscription-based business model. Lack of visible contact information and policies limits assessment of market positioning and partnerships. The company should improve transparency and provide clear business information to strengthen market trust and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak. There are no security headers detected in the HTML content, and DNSSEC is not enabled on the domain, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. The site uses HTTPS (implied by external asset URLs), but SSL configuration details are not provided. No incident response or security policy information is available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The presence of third-party scripts like Stripe and Mixpanel requires careful management to avoid data leakage. The 404 error page suggests potential site maintenance or misconfiguration issues. Overall, the security maturity is low, and the company should implement standard security headers, enable DNSSEC, and publish security policies to improve posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to protect against common web attacks.
  4. Fix broken links and ensure all pages are accessible to improve user experience and SEO.
  5. Publish contact information and business verification details to increase trust and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Supercast
Description
No business description available on the page content; the site currently shows a 404 error page with minimal content.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Stripe.js, Tailwind CSS, Trix Editor
Frameworks
Turbo (Hotwire)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Mixpanel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mixpanel
Marketing tools
Mixpanel, Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website currently returns a 404 Not Found error page with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  3. No contact information such as emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  4. Uses modern frontend technologies but lacks content and SEO optimization.
  5. Includes third-party scripts for analytics (Mixpanel) and payment processing (Stripe).
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML content provided.
  7. DNSSEC is not enabled on the domain.
  8. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  9. WHOIS data is consistent and transparent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack including Tailwind CSS for styling, Turbo (Hotwire) for enhanced navigation, and Stripe.js for payment integration. Hosting is on AWS as indicated by DNS servers. The site loads JavaScript assets and stylesheets from a dedicated CDN subdomain. However, the main page content is a 404 error page, indicating missing or misconfigured content. SEO and accessibility features are minimal, with no meta description or Open Graph tags detected. Performance is moderate but could not be fully assessed due to limited content. The site lacks CMS indicators and appears custom-built. Technical debt is evident from missing pages and lack of security headers. Modernization opportunities include improving content management, SEO, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with supercast.tech. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review supercast.tech.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.