Skip to main content

Security report for super.so

Super · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Super is a technology company founded in 2020 that offers a SaaS platform enabling users to create custom websites from Notion pages quickly and efficiently. The platform emphasizes performance, SEO optimization, and ease of use, targeting creators and teams who want professional websites without complex setups. The company has established a strong market presence with over 100,000 users and endorsements from notable companies. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and hosted on Vercel, leveraging various analytics and marketing tools including Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Flodesk. The site demonstrates excellent design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Security posture is good with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of super.so. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching super.so

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Super operates in the technology sector as a SaaS provider focused on website creation using Notion as a CMS. Its business model revolves around subscription-based services with a free tier to attract users. The company targets creators, professionals, and teams seeking fast, customizable web solutions. Market positioning is strong with a large user base and visible trust signals such as testimonials and partnerships. Revenue streams likely include paid subscriptions and affiliate marketing. The company leverages partnerships with analytics and marketing platforms to enhance user engagement. Growth indicators include a modern tech stack and active marketing integrations. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified from the data.

Security posture

The security maturity of Super's website is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration includes clientTransferProhibited status, reducing domain hijacking risks. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice for DNS security. The absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. There is no public incident response or security policy information, nor a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Privacy compliance is lacking, with no visible privacy or cookie policies or consent mechanisms, which could pose regulatory risks especially under GDPR. Overall, the site is secure but could improve transparency and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Super
Description
Super enables users to create custom websites from Notion pages quickly with features like instant page loads, SEO optimization, and customized theming. It focuses on ease of use by managing content in Notion while providing a professional web presence.
Key services
Custom website creation from Notion pages, SEO optimization, Instant page loads, Theming and customization, Content syncing with Notion
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Vercel hosting, AWS DNS, Flodesk (email marketing), Microsoft Clarity (analytics), Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Marketing tools
Flodesk
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page HTML.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics/tracking tools.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Testimonials and trusted company logos enhance credibility.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Domain WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business age.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and performant technology stack centered on Next.js and hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast page loads and good scalability. The integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing approach. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good accessibility practices. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates some technical debt in security hardening. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests a gap in compliance and user trust. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from focused improvements in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with super.so. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review super.so.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.