Skip to main content

Security report for sungis.lv

SIA SunGIS · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SunGIS is a Latvian technology company specializing in geospatial data processing, geographic information system (GIS) development, implementation, and customization. The company offers consulting and training services and develops interactive geographic maps and digital products such as Go GIS and GABALS.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sungis.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SunGIS operates in the technology sector focusing on geospatial data and GIS solutions. Its business model includes software development, consulting, and training services, targeting government agencies, private companies, and professionals in land and infrastructure management. The company leverages partnerships with Latvian open technology associations and government bodies, enhancing its market position. Revenue streams likely come from software licenses, consulting fees, and training programs. The company demonstrates growth through participation in EU-funded projects and sponsorship of international open-source GIS conferences. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains such as gabals.lv and lata.org.lv, indicating a collaborative approach to open data and GIS innovation.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and client-side validation on forms. However, it lacks critical HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The contact form does not implement CAPTCHA or anti-CSRF tokens, increasing the risk of spam and cross-site request forgery. No published security policy or incident response contact information is available, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or security certifications. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to align with best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Add CAPTCHA or other bot mitigation techniques on contact forms to reduce spam and abuse.
  3. Incorporate anti-CSRF tokens in form submissions to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
  4. Publish a clear privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  5. Establish and publicize a security policy and incident response contact to enhance transparency and preparedness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA SunGIS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA SunGIS
Description
SunGIS nodarbojas ar ģeotelpisko datu apstrādi, ģeogrāfisko informācijas sistēmu izstrādi, ieviešanu un pielāgošanu, konsultācijām un apmācībām, izstrādā interaktīvās ģeogrāfiskās kartes.
Key services
Ģeotelpisko datu apstrāde, Programmatūras izstrāde, Konsultācijas, Apmācības
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay jQuery plugin, ResponsiveVideos jQuery plugin, MozLive API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Form input validation with client-side checks
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  3. Contact form collects name, email, message, and requires consent checkbox.
  4. No phone numbers found on the website.
  5. Social media presence on Twitter and Facebook with official company pages.
  6. Use of CDN (CloudFront) for hosting static assets.
  7. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Good use of semantic HTML and meta tags for SEO.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML.
  10. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Moze CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 2.2.4 and several jQuery plugins for UI components such as Fancybox and responsive videos. Static assets are served via Amazon CloudFront CDN, which supports good content delivery performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported through meta description tags and canonical URLs, but no structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags are present. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization by updating JavaScript libraries and enhancing accessibility compliance. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for improvement in security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sungis.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sungis.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.