Skip to main content

Security report for stukent.com

Stukent · Education · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stukent is an educational technology company specializing in providing innovative Simternships™ and digital courseware designed to enhance experiential learning in marketing, business, and communication classrooms. The company positions itself as a leader in educational tools that bridge theoretical knowledge with real-world application, targeting educators and students primarily in high school and higher education sectors. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and integration of modern marketing and analytics tools. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and employs multiple tracking and marketing scripts including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure; however, the absence of security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies suggests room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. The WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency but does not detract significantly from the overall trustworthiness given the professional website content. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, publishing security policies, and improving domain registration transparency to strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stukent.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention stukent.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4,029
Employees
25
Customers
3,731
Third parties
273
Weak passwords
5%

Latest record dated 2026-06-10 · 19 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for stukent.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –login.stukent.com2026-06-10
  • –login.stukent.com2026-05-21
  • –www.stukent.com2026-05-13
  • –www.stukent.com2026-02-04
  • –home.stukent.com2026-02-04

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Stukent operates in the education sector with a focus on digital learning solutions that simulate internships and provide up-to-date courseware. Their business model revolves around selling educational content and tools to educators and institutions, supported by certifications, webinars, and expert sessions. The company leverages partnerships and related domains such as cte.stukent.com to expand its offerings. The presence of multiple marketing and tracking tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement and growth. The company appears to be medium-sized with a clear market niche and a strong brand presence in experiential learning. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The lack of explicit contact information and privacy policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks, which is positive for security. However, the lack of detected security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options indicates potential vulnerabilities to common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no visible consent mechanisms, which could pose regulatory risks under GDPR or similar frameworks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR and global privacy compliance.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stukent
Description
Stukent provides cutting-edge Simternships™ and courseware to help educators help students help the world.
Key services
Simternships™, Courseware, Certifications, Webinars, Expert Sessions, Events
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Intercom
Frameworks
Elementor, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of modern JavaScript libraries
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive elements.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided HTML.
  3. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts are used, but no explicit consent mechanism detected.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  6. Website uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, leveraging modern web technologies and multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts. The site uses Google Fonts, various CSS and JavaScript libraries, and integrates with marketing platforms such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Reddit, and Microsoft Clarity. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) for rich snippets. However, the site lacks some security best practices such as security headers and explicit privacy compliance mechanisms. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and engaging user experience but requires improvements in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stukent.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stukent.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.