Skip to main content

Security report for study-in-germany.com

DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst) · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.study-in-germany.com is an authoritative educational portal aimed at international students interested in studying in Germany. It is supported by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), providing comprehensive information on study planning, visa requirements, financing, and living in Germany. The site is professionally designed with clear navigation and rich content primarily in German, targeting prospective international students. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js and Nuxt.js, with analytics provided by eTracker. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced and cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR, but explicit security headers and incident response contacts are not evident. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces trust in domain registration transparency, although the website content and branding strongly suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and privacy compliance but has room for improvement in security posture and business credibility transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain:

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching study-in-germany.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal serves as a key information source for international students planning to study in Germany, positioning itself as an official and trusted resource backed by government entities. Its business model is informational and advisory, likely funded by public institutions. The target market includes international students worldwide seeking study opportunities in Germany. The site offers detailed guidance on admission requirements, visa processes, financing options, and community engagement, which are critical services for its audience. The partnership with BMBF and DAAD enhances its credibility and market position. The absence of direct contact details and WHOIS transparency may limit direct business engagement but does not detract from its authoritative role. The site’s content quality and user experience are excellent, supporting its competitive advantage as a comprehensive study-in-Germany resource.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and GDPR-compliant cookie consent implemented. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others suggests room for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which could be a risk factor. Overall, the site is secure for general informational use but would benefit from improved security headers, explicit policies, and incident response information to strengthen trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Provide a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party libraries and analytics tools for vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance business credibility by adding verified contact information and trust signals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst)
Description
Information portal to help international students plan and prepare for studying and living in Germany, including requirements, visa, financing, and community support.
Key services
Study planning guidance, Visa and residence information, Financing and scholarships, Community engagement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, Nuxt.js, eTracker analytics
Frameworks
Vue.js, Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent modal with GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
eTracker
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
eTracker
Marketing tools
eTracker
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in German language.
  2. Strong focus on international students planning to study in Germany.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts visible.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack using Vue.js and Nuxt.js frameworks, enabling server-side rendering and good performance. It uses eTracker for analytics and includes a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with semantic HTML and ARIA attributes. Preloading of scripts and use of SVG icons indicate attention to performance and design. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site’s performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and security headers to enhance speed and security. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from additional security and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with study-in-germany.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review study-in-germany.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.