Skip to main content

Security report for storyshare.co

Legacy Sarl · Technology · United States

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

StoryShare is a technology company specializing in a video recording and community engagement platform that enables organizations to embed video recording and playback directly on their websites. The platform supports video feedback, testimonials, interviews, surveys, and event engagement, targeting organizations, authors, and event organizers. The company operates primarily in the technology sector with a small business profile and was founded in 2018. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor, indicating a modern but standard CMS infrastructure. The technical setup includes common libraries such as jQuery and Swiper, with hosting likely provided by GoDaddy based on WHOIS data. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is limited to a contact form with no direct emails or phone numbers published. Overall, the website is professional and functional but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching storyshare.co

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
53
Average
53
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche player in the video community engagement market, offering embedded video recording and playback with community management features. Its business model is B2B SaaS, targeting organizations that require authentic video feedback and interaction with their audiences. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its seamless browser-based video recording and playback capabilities combined with community management tools. The company maintains privacy protection on its domain registration, which is typical for small tech startups. The website content and branding are consistent, with trust signals such as testimonials and patent pending notices. However, the lack of direct contact details and limited privacy compliance features may impact user trust and conversion.

Security posture

The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks DNSSEC, which could protect against DNS spoofing. No security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended best practices to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no published security policy or incident response information, and no dedicated security contact channels were found. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism also indicates incomplete privacy compliance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard security hardening measures and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan with dedicated contact channels.
  5. Provide direct contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to improve credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Legacy Sarl
Description
StoryShare is a technology platform that enables video recording, playback, and community building around video content. It offers embedded video recording on websites, video moderation, user permissions, and analytics integration. The platform targets organizations and communities to facilitate authentic video feedback, testimonials, interviews, surveys, and event engagement.
Key services
Embedded video recording, Video playback, Community management, Video moderation, Analytics integration, Custom branding and platform integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Swiper, SmartMenus
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Fonts
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on video recording and community engagement technology.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite privacy policy presence.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of modern WordPress and Elementor technology stack.
  7. No external advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond Google Fonts.
  8. WHOIS privacy protection used but justified for business type.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Elementor page builder, leveraging common JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Swiper for UI components. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses a CDN for content delivery, contributing to moderate performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, accessibility features appear basic and SEO optimization is minimal, with no advanced metadata or structured data detected beyond standard WordPress outputs. The technical infrastructure is typical for small to medium-sized business websites but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with storyshare.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review storyshare.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.