Skip to main content

Security report for stinpriza.org

Στην Πρίζα · Technology · Greece

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Network security.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Στην Πρίζα is a Greek worker collective specializing in technology services including computer repairs, website construction, hosting, and free software consulting. Established in 2012, it serves a local Greek audience with a focus on community and open-source technologies. The website is built on WordPress and uses common web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap, hosted by OVH sas. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information and GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and anti-spam measures in place, though additional security headers and a formal security policy could enhance protection. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website content, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stinpriza.org

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
100
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The collective operates in the technology sector, targeting individuals and organizations needing computer repair, web hosting, and free software solutions. Its business model is cooperative and community-oriented, emphasizing free software and Debian consultancy. The website content and social media presence reinforce its niche market position. The absence of advertising and tracking tools suggests a privacy-conscious approach. The company is small-sized, with a stable market presence since 2012, and no parent or subsidiary companies identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, it lacks advanced security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of honeypot fields in forms indicates some anti-spam measures. The absence of DNSSEC is a minor security gap. Overall, the site is secure for its scale but could benefit from enhanced security practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding accessibility improvements to enhance usability for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Στην Πρίζα
Registration number
166259061000
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Στην Πρίζα
Description
Κολεκτίβα εργασίας Στην Πρίζα - Επισκευές υπολογιστών, Κατασκευή συντήρηση και Φιλοξενία Ιστοσελίδων, Ελεύθερο λογισμικό.
Key services
Computer repairs, Website construction and hosting, Free software consulting, Email hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap, Lightslider, Masonry, PHP
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of honeypot anti-spam in contact forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in Greek and targeted at local Greek audience
  3. Clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance
  4. Contact information is complete and consistent
  5. No security policy or incident response info published
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
  7. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries
  8. Domain is long-standing and registered with reputable registrar OVH
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with a custom theme and several JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Bootstrap, Lightslider, and Masonry for UI enhancements. Hosting is provided by OVH sas, a reputable provider. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate, with caching and minified CSS assets observed. Accessibility features are basic but present. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stinpriza.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stinpriza.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.