Skip to main content

Security report for stiftung-zuhoeren.de

Stiftung Zuhören · Education · Germany

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stiftung Zuhören is a German non-profit foundation dedicated to promoting conscious listening in early childhood education and schools. The organization provides training and educational materials aimed at Kitas, primary and special schools, and after-school care. The website reflects a focused educational mission with a clear target audience and a niche market position. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and incorporates modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Real Cookie Banner Pro, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The presence of Matomo analytics shows a commitment to privacy-conscious data collection. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and employs a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, though it lacks explicit security policy or incident response pages. Overall, the site demonstrates good security hygiene with room for improvement in security headers and formal policies. The domain registration data is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the organization. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and compliant with GDPR requirements, making it a reliable and professional platform for its educational mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stiftung-zuhoeren.de

This scan found 24 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
100
Average
54
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the education and non-profit sectors, focusing on listening education for children and educators. Its business model revolves around providing training and educational resources, likely funded through grants, donations, or public funding. The website's clear branding and consistent messaging support its niche positioning. Partnerships with platforms like LearningApps.org and media entities like Bayerischer Rundfunk suggest a collaborative ecosystem. The absence of commercial advertising or affiliate programs aligns with its non-profit status. The foundation targets educators and institutions, emphasizing quality content and compliance with data protection laws, which enhances trust and credibility in its market segment.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and a robust cookie consent framework that respects GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security score. There is no visible incident response or security policy page, which could be a gap in transparency and preparedness. The use of up-to-date plugins and WordPress core is assumed but should be regularly audited. Overall, the site maintains a secure environment suitable for its audience but would benefit from enhanced security controls and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the site against common web attacks.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to enforce HTTPS usage and prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  3. Develop and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding accessibility improvements to enhance usability for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Stiftung Zuhören
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stiftung Zuhören
Description
Die gemeinnützige Stiftung Zuhören fördert das bewusste Zuhören in Kitas, Grund- und Förderschulen, im Ganztag und im Hort. Sie bietet Fortbildungen und Material zur Zuhörbildung an.
Key services
Fortbildungen (training), Materialien zur Zuhörbildung (educational materials)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Yoast SEO, Real Cookie Banner Pro, Matomo Analytics, Vimeo, YouTube, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, LearningApps.org, jsDelivr CDN
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Yoast SEO plugin
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with Real Cookie Banner Pro.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress plugins.
  4. Clear privacy and legal pages in German language.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or security issues detected in HTML content.
  6. No incident response or security policy pages found.
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  8. Good GDPR compliance indicators.
  9. Contact information includes email and contact form but no explicit phone number found.
  10. Content is educational and non-profit oriented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, leveraging popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and Real Cookie Banner Pro for GDPR-compliant cookie management. It integrates external services like Vimeo and YouTube for media content and uses Matomo for privacy-focused analytics. The site loads resources from reputable CDNs including jsDelivr and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The technical setup reflects a modern, well-maintained infrastructure suitable for a non-profit educational organization. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance to further enhance the technical robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stiftung-zuhoeren.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stiftung-zuhoeren.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.