Skip to main content

Security report for stifrance.com

Systems & Technology International · Technology · France

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Systems & Technology International (STI) is a France-based company established in 1992, specializing in supplying equipment to the Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry. The company positions itself as a leading supplier in Southern Europe and North Africa, offering equipment sourcing, technical service support, and spare parts centralization. The website reflects a basic digital presence built on WordPress with common plugins and a Visual Composer page builder. While contact information is clearly provided, the site lacks comprehensive content, privacy policies, and advanced security features. The technical infrastructure is moderate with room for modernization and security improvements. Security posture is basic, with no visible security headers and outdated software versions, posing potential risks. Overall, the website is functional but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security, and content richness to improve trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stifrance.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

STI operates in a niche technology sector focused on semiconductor manufacturing equipment supply and support. Its business model revolves around equipment distribution and technical services, targeting semiconductor manufacturers primarily in Southern Europe and North Africa. The company maintains partnerships, including a US-based entity (stiusainc.com), indicating some international presence. The website's limited content and absence of detailed business or financial information suggest a small-sized enterprise with a focused market approach. The presence of an extranet link indicates some level of customer engagement and service delivery infrastructure. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed, limiting deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low to moderate security maturity level. The absence of critical security headers, outdated WordPress core and plugins, and lack of visible privacy or cookie policies highlight compliance and security gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which may hinder timely security issue management. The use of HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the HTML content, and no advanced security mechanisms like CSP or HSTS are detected. These factors collectively suggest a need for improved security governance and technical hardening to protect business and customer data effectively.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration to secure all website traffic.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  3. Update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to the latest versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
STI - Systems and Technology International
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Systems & Technology International
Description
Established in 1992, Systems & Technology International (STI) is a leading supplier of equipment to the Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry, providing equipment from global sources, technical service support based in Paris and Malta, and spare parts centralization for customers in Southern Europe and North Africa.
Key services
Equipment supply, Technical service support, Spare parts centralization
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Nivo Slider, Visual Composer (WPBakery), MailPoet, Contact Form 7, Owl Carousel, MeanMenu, jQuery UI, Skrollr
Frameworks
WordPress 4.9.3
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs with http but no explicit HTTPS detected in HTML content)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
MailPoet
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Visual Composer and several common plugins.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in header and footer.
  4. No security policy or incident response information is present.
  5. No security headers detected in HTML content; potential security improvement area.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond MailPoet for marketing emails.
  7. Website content is minimal with some placeholder areas and limited textual content.
  8. No social media links found on the homepage.
  9. External links include partner site stiusainc.com and extranet login at infomaniak.com.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.9.3 with Visual Composer and several common plugins like MailPoet and Contact Form 7. The tech stack includes jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and other UI libraries. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. The presence of outdated software versions indicates technical debt and potential security risks. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site structure and navigation are clear but content is minimal, suggesting opportunities for content enrichment and modernization to improve user engagement and search engine visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stifrance.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stifrance.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.